A Government of National Conspiracy?

Anthony Barnett (London, OK): My good friend Tom Nairn is back from his regular sojourn in Melbourne but has come down with the flu, whose symptoms this winter seem to be particularly vicious and lasting. Gasping down the phone he promised to write a piece about what he thinks Brown will do next. He is convinced that he will seek to win power without a proper election, by creating a government of national unity. If you will excuse the pun, this will cash in on the crisis. The inclusion of Vince Cable seems to be critical to the success of such a master-stroke, to be orchestrated by Mandelson, aka "Bobby". I was meditating this scenario when, blow me down, Vince wrote his pitch for just such a stitch-up in the Mail on Sunday. After he attacked David Cameron by name for "moral indignation several years too late", but sent a signal by not criticising Gordon Brown.

Instead Cable wrote:

"There is, however, a deeper and bigger question: how to maintain a sense of national unity and purpose while the crisis unfolds.

Even if all the steps taken by governments work, it will take time to produce results.

Next year will be like an economic battle in which there are mounting casualties coming back from the front line but no sign of victory.

I believe the public will see the need to ‘stick together’ and, in particular, will expect the political parties to rise above the usual petty, tribal bickering.

There will be calls for a ‘government of national unity’, to get political adversaries round a table working together rather than pointing fingers at each other.

There must, of course, be vigorous debate and public accountability, as well as unity, but I think the public senses that this is not what they are getting at the moment.

I see the personal and party animosities played out every week at Westminster and wonder if the political classes are capable of grasping the enormity of the crisis we are in and the challenge to us to behave differently.

If we do not, the public will become seriously angry. We know from history that such anger can lead to extremes....

There is a vacuum of leadership waiting to be filled by those who can translate a craving for fairness and the sharing of pain into the economics and politics of every day life....

This is our chance to promote common sense, stability and the fair treatment of our fellow citizens. A happy and prosperous New Year to you all."


If that isn't a "Gizza a job, I can fill the vacuum" I don't know what is. It left me looking forward to Tom's full analysis as soon as he has recovered sufficiently so that he can set out the dynamics of a government of national conspiracy before it happens.

This article is published by Anthony Barnett, and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.

Comments

Dougthedug
31 December 2008 - 8:53pm

Anthony Barnett wrote:
He is convinced that he will seek to win power without a proper election, by creating a government of national unity. If you will excuse the pun, this will cash in on the crisis. The inclusion of Vince Cable seems to be critical to the success of such a master-stroke...
I think that a national government would be a step too far for the electorate, and it would be electoral suicide for the Conservatives, but if the Lib-Dems are thinking of joining the Westminster Government as Junior Labour they should take a long look at the Lib-Dem's current fortunes in Scotland where after nine years of being Labour's willing coalition partners in Holyrood they are now scraping along at the bottom of the polls.

Since this is Hogmanay the good Scots' Proverb, "If ye wad sup wi’ the deil, ye’ll need a lang spoon", is probably an appropriate one for Vince Cable to keep in mind. Gettin too close to Labour is not good for the Lib-Dems though I would find it amusing if they assumed it was a route to future power and success as they did in Holyrood.

Oscarapfel (not verified)
5 January 2009 - 11:17am

Given Broon's continual use of the 'Blitz' as the spirit that will deliver us from penury, I suspect that Mr Nairn, might be right on the button. Then again, didn't the electorate throw the leader of the last Government of Unity out on his ample backside in 1946?

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <h2> <h3> <div> <span> <blockquote> <!--break--> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr> <table> <td> <tr> <img> <map>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options