Part of the openDemocracy Network

Power2010

Breaking the monopoly of the professional politician: Guy Aitchison's idea for popular forums in Parliament
 

When you're in a hole, stop digging: Pam Giddy's advice to MPs who still don't get it
 

Ending the divine right of political parties: Steve Hawkins makes a radical suggestion
 

Les Miserables and Power 2010: John Jackson diagnoses the political class's selective crisis-mongering
 

A call to oD readers: Helena Kennedy calls on oD readers to support Power2010
 

More in this series

Submit your idea for the Power 2010 pledge.

The British Crisis

Do the public really want to change ‘the system’?: Stuart Wilks-Heeg presents polling evidence
 

Don't trust MPs' constitutional poker: Guy Aitchison supports the call for a citizens' convention
 

Brown's 'National Council for Democratic Renewal': Anthony Barnett on the Prime Minister's desperate proposal
 

More in this series

Navigation

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

Northern Ireland could stymie "super-department"

Robin Wilson, 13 - 08 - 2008
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Robin Wilson (Belfast, Policy Analyst): The suggestion that the various secretaries of state for the nations and regions should be wrapped up into one department has made sense ever since devolution was established in the initial years of ‘New’ Labour. But devolution to Scotland, Wales and (always shakily) Northern Ireland was, paradoxically, characterised by the patrician English trope of amateurish muddling through. And so the repeated case made by the Constitution Unit for a formal system of intergovernmental relations, as in Canada or Australia—and of which the unified department would have been one element, along with Lords reform to make the second chamber a voice for the nations and regions—fell on deaf Whitehall ears. Other departments in effect became ‘English’ departments, even when their actions had implications for devolved counterparts.

A decision to move belatedly towards having a single minister for the devolved jurisdictions at the cabinet table—a further step from the rather awkward job-sharing of recent years—would certainly be welcome, if media speculation is borne out. But a fly in the ointment remains Northern Ireland—and if such a move were premised on a belief that imminent devolution of policing and justice powers would slot in the last piece of the jigsaw of a settlement for the troubled region, this could turn out to be a mistaken assumption.

While it is true that the first and deputy first ministers, Peter Robinson of the Democratic Unionist Party and Martin McGuinness of Sinn Féin, have agreed that policing and justice should be devolved as a single department under one minister, and that minister should not be from either of their parties, they have not agreed on the critical question—when it is to happen. 

The DUP is in no hurry: it has no intention of accepting the transfer unless and until it can claim it has put the IRA out of business. Mr Robinson will not be retreading the path of David Trimble, the former Ulster Unionist leader who was discredited by the failure of the IRA to comply with the decommissioning deadline in the Belfast agreement, by the cynical way in which Tony Blair as prime minister treated this as a mere matter of Realpolitik and by the ruthless manner in which the DUP exploited Mr Trimble’s discomfiture.

As for SF, the party is facing growing grassroots alienation over how its political strategy for a united Ireland has stalled, and indeed how every demand it makes on behalf of Northern Ireland Catholics—from the abolition of selection at 11 to an Irish-language bill—is blocked by the DUP, armed with the veto power it secured, as a condition for accepting power-sharing with SF, in the St Andrews agreement of October 2006. That agreement may have slated devolution of policing and justice for May 2008 but that deadline also came and went.

London and Dublin will renew pressure on the DUP in September, having lent on the Independent Monitoring Commission to produce an ‘ad hoc’ report that month which they hope will show the IRA has wound up its structure, having wound down its campaign. But the most senior Catholic policeman in Northern Ireland, Peter Sheridan, says this has yet to happen. And, indeed, with the current bemused mood among the ‘republican base’, and with the ‘dissident republicans’ gaining recruits, Gerry Adams and Mr McGuinness will have no desire to remove the last vestige of their authoritarian control—shaky even in west Belfast and south Armagh—or in so doing so to make finally clear, including to themselves, that no residual organisation is being retained for a political rainy day.

Mr Adams is very conscious—because Mr Robinson has made it very public—that the DUP leadership is seeking in the long run to replace the current, four-party, mandatory executive set-up at Stormont with a voluntary power-sharing alternative which would, in effect, be unionist-dominated. The republicans were happy that they could best the former bellowing bigot, Rev Ian Paisley, reduced by age to sentimentalism. But since Mr Robinson assumed the reins of government and party power the devolved Executive Committee has only been allowed to meet once by SF and no meeting is envisaged before mid-September—a three-month break. 

Mr Adams is determined to show, having not deigned to assume ministerial office himself, that he remains a power in the land to which Mr Robinson (and, indirectly, the current prime minister, Gordon Brown) must bend. If the DUP does not shift, he wants London and Dublin to exercise the joint authority they threatened to prod Mr Paisley into dealing with the Provos.

Meantime, ordinary Northern Ireland citizens are left increasingly frustrated by the inability and unwillingness of the political class to reach accommodations on the outstanding issues, with 24 executive papers still in the pending tray. These include an anti-poverty strategy and an affordable-housing review—which seem rather more immediate to many in these straitened times than whether or not the police officer in the passing car is or is not accountable to politicians at Stormont.

The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, has become virtually invisible in the region. But if Mr Brown thinks that means he can treat Northern Ireland as normalised, wrapping up the Northern Ireland Office into a Department of the Regions, he may well find Messrs Adams and Robinson, however unwelcome, continuing to bang separately on the door of No 10—to demand he apply his clunking fist to support their side in the sectarian arm-wrestle between them.

And that is the larger difficulty. Devolution to Northern Ireland had two contradictory goals: to provide SF with as political place in the sun, which frightened the Protestant community into the arms of the DUP, and to promote reconciliation through power-sharing, of which the DUP is congenitally incapable. It is unlikely to be put on a secure footing by another patched-up deal supervised by London and Dublin. Only more radical constitutional re-engineering, removing the features of the Belfast, and still more St Andrews, agreements which institutionalised ethnicity, will provide the enduring settlement obviating the need for a proconsular supervisor at Hillsborough.

This article adheres to the openDemocracy.net principles.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Hendre (not verified) said:

Wed, 2008-08-13 11:15

To pick up on a bit of a ‘historic’ point - this and other posts suggest that the individual Secretaries of State should have been jettisoned virtually from the outset. Perhaps it should be remembered as noted by the Richard Commission Report:

The model of devolution proposed in A Voice for Wales, the White Paper which preceded the 1997 referendum, was agreed by the Labour Party in
opposition following extensive debate.

That is the Labour Party in Wales. The settlement enacted in 1999 was the one democratically endorsed by Welsh Labour in which a Secretary of State for Wales played a key role. Obviously no such considerations applied in Northern Ireland.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img> <map>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

Books from Amazon

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future