Muslim women in Britain, are sluicing away restrictive cultural practices and reclaiming their fundamental Islamic rights, says Samia Rahman, part of our coverage of International Women's Day, 2008.
While watching television on a sweltering afternoon in Bhopal, India
I was struck by a news report. A Headteacher was decrying the use of mobile
phones among her pupils. Nothing particularly out of the ordinary there.
However, her point was that girls, young women, any female for that matter,
should not be allowed mobile phones. A girl's entire moral wellbeing
depended on it.
The Headteacher appealed to parents to safeguard the chastity of
their daughters. Armed with a mobile phone any girl would be sucked
into a web of illicit phone calls with unworthy scoundrels leading to
stolen meetings and eventual ruin. It was inevitable. Bemused by this, I asked
my 20 year old cousin her opinion. She concurred, explaining that if you give
some girls too much freedom they take advantage. It all smacked of "Catholic
girl syndrome" to me and reminded me of the time I was speaking at a
University in Doha.
The audience was segregated, with boys on one side and girls on the other.
Eventually, a fellow speaker asked whether I had noticed the bluetooth flirting
going on in the room. His mobile had clocked up 62 attempts to engage him in
conversation as bluetooth-activated cupid's arrows were being flung from one
side of the room to the other. It seems the harder you try to police a person's
morality, the more creative methods of subterfuge they will employ.
Women have long been the collateral fodder in a patriarchal monopoly on Islam.
Practices that drive women's rights activists to distraction are deeply
misunderstood by Muslims themselves and often subject to historical
context and qualification. The barbaric act of female circumcision has no basis
in the Qur'an and is a cultural deviation no doubt concocted
by misogynists who find the idea of a woman experiencing sexual pleasure
anathema. Let's take polygamy as another example. To the
claim it is sanctioned within Islam, I would point out a man may only take
another wife on the condition that his treatment of each is strictly equal -
financially, emotionally, sexually. As it is humanly impossible to successfully
do this, I infer that polygamy was never meant to be practised and is
therefore unIslamic. And I'm not the only one.
Muslim men, and specifically women in Britain, are sluicing away
restrictive cultural practices and reclaiming their fundamental Islamic
rights. Second generation British Muslims were and still are brought up on
the values and traditions of their country of origin, wherever that may be. For
women, Islam has been about the home, and not bringing it into disrepute.
Esteem is attained through domestic prowess and being a good Muslim means
sacrificing individuality to conform to community standards of dress, behaviour
and marriagability.
But the times they are a-changing, and with a little enlightenment, Muslim
women are discovering that Islam can afford them dignity and rights. The right
to refuse forced marriage, to pursue a career, to enjoy an equal status in
marriage. For many observers the physical manifestation of a
woman's journey to Islam is the adopting of the hijab. My heart
sinks every time I am asked why these women are forced to hide
their beauty. Try telling that to the fashion-conscious, hilarious and
intelligent girls about town I know who wear it.
This transition is ongoing, and is a far-off idyll for many who continue to
struggle against patriarchy, ignorance, emotional blackmail and cultural
Islam. I know many women who have the short end of the
stick. Balancing a career, home, children, a husband imbued
with the traditional gender roles he grew up with, and
expectant in-laws. The question remains, can Muslim women have it
all? Well, if we want to, why not?
Samia Rahman is a London-based freelance journalist and former Deputy Editor of emel magazine.

Later this month | How do we dismantle the institution of war?












Comments
since theirs is a religion (as most are) that doesn't allow one to pick and choose what is acceptable and what is not. By encouraging women to live their lives by submitting to prophets, a sky-god, inerrant scriptures, men, etc...but with a nod and wink...seems so fake to me. Plus, while an intelligent woman like Rahman is able to see the bull-shit of her faith and pick and choose what she practices, millions cannot and are forced to live in subjugation...generation upon generation...the same is true of Chrisitianity. The "apologistic domino effect" is the reason we have Timothy McVeighs and Osama bin Ladens in this world...there is always a religious group that understands and apologizes for the next more fundamentalist faith. If you want to keep believing that Islam is all about women's rights, you haven't read the book. It is all about submission to men who submit to their version of god (actually, the version of a polygamist, pedophile who lived 1900 years ago). If this is what you want to reclaim, have at it.
Post new comment