The cunning of the Olympic flame

The sight of symbolic attacks on a symbol (the flame) of a symbolic representation of war (the games) may seem too layered even for our mediatised sensitivities. And yet .... the protest works for me. I asked Grace and Kanishk in the office today, and neither could muster much enthusiasm for the games. I asked David (our Front Page editor) later on, and he remarked: "... it all seems overdetermined, don't you think? the games, Tibet ... it's a big year".

Overdetermined? Just simple causality to me ... until I saw the possible denouement in all its symbolic glory. The flame crosses the world leaving a smokey trail of imperial abuse; the games and the consumer brands behind the olympics are irrecoverably tarnished as they should have been in 1936; the Chinese, facing a boycott of the opening ceremony, save face by offering good faith talks to the Dalai Lama ...

The flame is a trial by fire for the Chinese state, and in this fantasy, it passes.

This article is published by , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it with attribution for non-commercial purposes following the CC guidelines. For other queries about reuse, click here. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.