Forget Luzhkov: bulldogs under the carpet again

The struggle between Moscow’s mayor Luzhkov and President Medvedev has gripped Russia. What are those’ bulldogs under the carpet’ really fighting about? There are bigger battles going on, explains Vladimir Pastukhov.

In Russia, the brighter the ray of truth, the darker the cellar from which it shines.

In Russia the campaign against the ‘cult of the capital’ is underway with a vengeance.

But the political scandal surrounding Luzhkov has very little to do with Luzhkov himself. It’s not so much a battle waged by the Kremlin and the White House [Prime Minister’s office, ed] against the Moscow Mayor as between the Kremlin and the White House over Luzhkov. The reasons for the conflict are to be found elsewhere.

Cracks caused by internal tension.

I’m not sure that anyone had given any serious thought to planning the current attack on Luzhkov ahead of time. Especially as someone wanted to start it right at this moment.

Luzhkov

The political scandal surrounding Moscow mayor Yuri Luzhkov has very little to do with Luzhkov himself 

It all happened of its own accord. Tension simply cannot go on increasing for ever – sooner or later a spark had to go off. Political relations within and surrounding the Putin-Medvedev ‘tandem’ have become too complex and intricate. One thing led to another, there was an atmosphere of general suspicion and a premature war broke out. A war that in fact no one is properly prepared for, and which will be of absolutely no benefit to anyone.

The Kremlin has opened a political Pandora’s box.

I don’t rule out the possibility that soon our television screens will be full of such monstrosities that by comparison tales of the Baturina-Luzhkov family will seem like society gossip column reports.

Luzhkov has done nothing that other members of the ruling elite would not have done over the last 15 years. His empire differs little from the empires of other officials. What has Luzhkov done for his wife that St. Petersburg governor Valentina Matvienko has not done for her son? This list could be continued ad infinitum.

If the ruling elite doesn’t have the sense and self-control to stop this campaign, then the mutual denunciations will soon cause YouTube to overheat. It will be practically impossible to keep the filthy stream of political faeces within its banks. It will flood the entire field…

These incidents look more like a political accident than an organized plan of action.

There were no obvious reasons for the hurry. Luzhkov’s term in power ends in June next year anyway. His chances of being re-elected were practically zero, and he understood this. In a normal situation, these few months would have been of no significance to either the Kremlin or the White House. All the discussions about Luzhkov’s special role in ensuring election results are a bluff. As long as society is well fed and asleep, then Luzhkov is not necessary; when it wakes up, Luzhkov won’t be able to help.

The cost of transporting Luzhkov’s bees out of Moscow was tens of times higher than disbursements necessitated by the shortage of honey.

This campaign has nothing to do with the war on corruption. The country learnt nothing from the hastily edited reports that it didn’t know before. What we are seeing is an official admission of something that has long been an open secret. But heavens, just look how they did it! The films shown on NTV channel are so disgusting that they are enough to make people go out and demonstrate in support of Luzhkov.

It all looks like a tournament without any prizes.

None of the parties involved gains anything significant from a victory in this “Blitzkrieg”.

Whether Luzhkov will step down or sit things out is of absolutely no significance in this situation. As I already said, Luzhkov’s departure was pre-planned before this scandal, and a few months made no difference at all. This battle is not directed against Luzhkov.

The question of who will replace Luzhkov seems more significant. It is quite important whether this person is a Putin or a Medvedev figure, or someone independent. The nervousness of the last few weeks shows that there is no unanimity between the Kremlin and the White House about who Luzhkov’s successor will be. But there was no special need to solve this issue immediately.

All three of the main participants of the conflict – Medvedev, Putin and Luzhkov – have become hostages of historical events.

I have three explanations for this incident and for why events unfolded so quickly.

The first explanation is the battle for the ‘Moscow inheritance’ in the corridors of the Kremlin and the White House had become so intense that one of the contenders, willingly or unwillingly, provoked a false start,

The second is that the complications in the Putin-Medvedev relationship mean they can no longer act in harmony, nipping risky initiatives by people in their entourage in the bud.

The third is that Luzhkov himself, whose political soundness has been in doubt for quite some time, behaved in an excessively assertive manner, and thus provoked the premature attack on him.

It follows from all of this that no one really calculated the political consequences of this war. The only question that should be on everybody’s mind at present is whether it will be possible to keep this campaign under control.

It’s easy to open Pandora’s box, but hard to close it. In Russia, political stability often turns into its opposite, bypassing all the transitional periods.

About the author

Vladimir Pastukhov is visiting fellow at St Anthony's College, Oxford and advisor to the Chairman of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation 

Read On

Forever Putin?, by Amy Knight, The New York Review of Books, Feb. 11th, 2010

Dmitry Medvedev, personal web site

Luzhkov’s last fight?, by Anna Arutunyan, Moscow Times, 13.09.2010

Kremlin Rising: Vladimir Putin's Russia and the End of Revolution, Peter Baker and Susan Glaser, Scribner; First Edition edition (May 31, 2005), 464 pages

Putin's Russia (Revised Edition) [Paperback], Lilia Shevtsova (Author), Antonina W. Bouis (Translator), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; Rev Exp edition (January 2005), 457 pages

More On

Luzhkov 2

Yuri Luzhkov (has been mayor of Moscow since June 1992, when he replaced Gavril Popov.

In 1958, Luzhkov graduated from the I.M. Gubkin Institute of Oil and Gas in Moscow, before working as a scientific researcher until the mid 1960s.

He joined the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) in 1968 and was first elected to Moscow city council in 1977, holding various positions in the city administration before becoming mayor in 1992.

Initially appointed by presidential decree, Luzhkov was reelected as Moscow mayor in 1996, 1999, 2003 and 2007. He is also vice-chairman, and one of the founders of, the United Russia party. Luzhkov gained popular support for early policies such as providing free transportation to the elderly and encouraging entrepreneurship. He won 95% of the vote in his first mayoral election victory in 1996.  

During Luzhkov’s time as mayor, Moscow has seen considerable development in the transport and construction sectors. Luzhkov oversaw the rebuilding of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour and commissioned several prominent sculptures from Zurab Tsereteli. He has been criticized for developing old parts of the city at great cost to historic buildings and monuments. Luzhkov also tightened the system of registration for non residents of the city, leading to frequent police I.D. checks. 

Luzhkov was initially tipped for presidential success in 2000. The rise in popularity of Vladimir Putin, however, led to Luzhkov’s Fatherland-All Russia party coming a disappointing third in State Duma elections in 1999. Luzhkov then accepted integration into United Russia and supported Putin in his 2000 election campaign. 

Luzhkov has been married twice. He had two sons with his first wife, Marina Bashilova, before her death in 1989. His second wife is Yelena Baturina, a real estate magnate and Russia’s richest woman. Luzhkov is a strong advocate of sport and is also famous for his love of bee-keeping.

www.russiaprofile.org