Debate: "A hung parliament would be hell"

Subjects:
What are the arguments? I tried to do as much justice as possible to the anti-hangers on this IntelligenceSquared written debate - click through for the detail
About the author

Tony Curzon Price  is Editor-in-Chief of openDemocracy and blogs at tony.curzon.com


What are the arguments? I tried to do as much justice as possible to the anti-hangers on this IntelligenceSquared written debate - click through the image below for the detail. Laying it out like this, with every concession made to the anti's and wanting to give them the best arguments they can have makes it quite clear the type of politics the anti's are defending: managerial, anti-democratic and ultimately tinged with authoritarianism. (The full text is here, or click on the image below).

Intelligence Squared - A hung parliament would be hell

This article is published by Tony Curzon Price, and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it with attribution for non-commercial purposes following the CC guidelines. For other queries about reuse, click here. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.