Part of the openDemocracy Network

Sortition and public policy




A major new series from Imprint Academic on the use of randomisation in education, politics and other public policy areas. Special discount prices for OurKingdom and openDemocracy readers.

Labour After Brown

From Milibland to Johnson land?: Jeremy Gilbert argues for Labour without neo-liberalism.

Magical thinking on Britishness: Anthony Barnett critiques Liam Byrne on fraternity.

Rule of law at risk: Geoffrey Bindman calls for a turn away from the marketisation of government.

A new Bill of Rights for Britain?: Guy Aitchison analyses Parliament's proposed new Bill of Rights.

Miliband - by our rights we will know you: Claire O'Brien puts forward a new progressive vision for Labour.

Recapturing liberal Britain: David Marquand challenges Labour's constitutional orthodoxy.

Miliband and the Liberal Democrats: James Graham on the case for realignment.

What is Labour's British story?: Writing from Scotland, Gerry Hassan widens the OurKingdom debate on Labour's future.

This is not Brown's crisis but Britain's: David Marquand says social democracy is bust and Britain may be too.

The Challenges for Miliband's Progressive Fusion: Fabian Society head Sunder Katwala responds to David Miliband.

NOT A DAY LONGER




What do we do now?: Anthony Barnett assesses the stakes for for liberals and radicals in David Davis's campaign against the erosion of rights and liberties


The Abundance of Caution: an authoritative essay by Anthony Barnett sets out the case against 42 Days

England Awakes?

England, Britain and multiculturalism: an OurKingdom exchange

A mild awakening?, England's turn? by David Goodhart

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

The Lisbon Treaty: Ireland’s awful secret

28 - 04 - 2008
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Catherine Reilly (Dublin, Metro Eireann): Burying bad news: never really a good idea, is it?

Just ask the former British government spin doctor who infamously called 9/11 a good day to "bury" bad news. She lost her job. Or indeed the Irish footballer who, in order to avoid international duty after his girlfriend's apparent miscarriage, ‘killed off' not one but two grandmothers when the media smelled a rat. Those terrace chants and nightclub wind-ups will follow him for life.

Burying bad news, we'll not be having that.

But now the dull spectre of faceless Eurocrats burying bad news has darkened the green fields and concrete playgrounds of Ireland.

It follows thus: two weeks ago, an email leaked to the Daily Mail in London, and originating from the British Foreign Office, suggested that European Commission officials had told Irish politicians that the commission was willing to tone down or delay messages that could be unhelpful during Ireland's Lisbon Treaty referendum campaign. The email, apparently written by a British diplomat in Dublin, also stated that the commission's Vice President Margot Wallström had told Ireland's Minister for Foreign Affairs Dermot Ahern TD (Teachta Dála - member of the Irish parliament) it would delay or tone down unhelpful announcements. Wallström has denied the accusations.

Sinn Féin, whose opposition to the Lisbon Treaty is at odds with the broad cross-party support for it, predictably latched onto the controversy as one would a winning bingo card on a dark, rainy night.

There is growing disquiet in Ireland at ongoing revelations that senior figures within the EU Commission and EU Parliament are attempting to suppress information from the Irish electorate in advance of the referendum on the Lisbon Treaty

remarked the party's MEP Mary Lou McDonald in the EU Parliament this week.

Pushing a few more buttons, she said Irish people "deserve the full and unvarnished truth about EU intentions regarding defence and security, budgetary matters or corporation tax."

Ireland's Taoiseach (prime minister) Bertie Ahern TD, who will prematurely vacate his post on the 6th of May following alleged inconsistencies over his personal finances, has already moved to dismiss the ‘burying bad news' allegations, as has his successor-in-waiting, Tánaiste (deputy prime minister) Brian Cowen TD.

What is most remarkable, however, are the messages still buried within the offending email. Published in full (needs subscription) in The Irish Times last week, the email bluntly stated, "so Irish thought treaty was taken for granted" (sic) when referring to official expectations that the Irish electorate will pass the treaty, and that "most people would not have time to study the text [of the treaty] and would go with the politicians they trusted".

Dublin law lecturer Rossa Fanning, in his opinion piece in The Irish Times on the 22nd of April, honed in on the ‘confusion factor' when he wrote that it is "a safe bet" that very few of the electorate will have read the 272-page treaty by the 12th of June. Fanning added that requesting the electorate to vote on something they have not read, and don't understand, is "of dubious value".

So, the population of the only EU nation scheduled to vote on a treaty setting out the future direction and mechanisms of the EU, is more than a little confused.

How did that get so buried?

Catherine Reilly is deputy editor of Metro Eireann, Ireland's multicultural weekly.

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Howard (not verified) said:

Tue, 2008-04-29 18:10

The Lisbon Treaty is much longer than 272 pages.

The advocates of the "official truth" elegantly ignore the fact that the new text itself only contains the modifications, deletions and additions to the existing treaties, which altogether add up to ca 3000 pages.

The new form of the old EU constitution called "Lisbon Treaty" - taking over federal state powers and abolishing sovereignty of the member states- is a constitution that is NOT readable in a linear way.

The Lisbon Treaty was NOT meant to be read by anyone, just to be blindly accepted. Because its former lineral version was read and rejected, the new form of the same text would naturally be rejected if it would be readable. If the peoples of Europe would understand that what they sign is the abolition of their national independence, they would not sign it. As simple as that.

Now, only those accept the Lisbon Treaty, the unreadable constitution of a new federal state, who believe in a centralised Europe of blind voters and blind national governments. The less the citizens are aware of the significance of the process Brussels has imposed on Europe the more freedom Brussels will enjoy in finishing what they started.

To learn all details on the Lisbon Treaty - with actual quotes from the text - and its legal implications, please visit the National Platform’s new site:

“Lisbon Treaty Irish Referendum Blog - National Platform”

http://nationalplatform.wordpress.com/

Our blog:

"The Lisbon Treaty Blog"

Facts about the Lisbon Treaty - what political science tells us

http://howardh.wordpress.com/about/

Neil Young (not verified) said:

Thu, 2008-05-08 20:47

Hi i just wanted to say that i have no clue as to what the "Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community" is other than what other people's opinions are.

That screams "NO" to me.

Since when did politics become a reality tv show?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

In Pictures


Email Alerts

Fill in the form below to sign up to our automatic daily alerts, or weekly editorial summary (you will be taken to another page to confirm which options you want).

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future