Part of the openDemocracy Network

The British Crisis

Do the public really want to change ‘the system’?: Stuart Wilks-Heeg presents polling evidence
 

Don't trust MPs' constitutional poker: Guy Aitchison supports the call for a citizens' convention
 

Brown's 'National Council for Democratic Renewal': Anthony Barnett on the Prime Minister's desperate proposal
 

More in this series

Who Polices The Police?

Open letter to the BBC: Guy Aitchison and Stuart White raise serious concerns with the BBC's coverage of G20 policing
 

The Met must stop spinning G20 policing: Defend Peaceful Protest on the Met's response to its critics
 

Met watchdog criticises G20 policing: Anna Bragga reports on the MPA meeting
 

Our campaign to defend peaceful protest launches: Guy Aitchison and Andy May have some questions for the Met following the policing of the G20
 

The architectural photographer as terrorist: Edward Denison recounts his detention for photographing a police station
 

Letter to the Beeb: Guy Aitchison responds to a complacent and misleading feature on "kettling" for the BBC website
 

Not "kettling" but "bubbling": Clare Coatman on polarised views of police and protesters
 

Kettling - another special relationship: Charles Shaw's eye-witness account of the practice's US debut
 

Practical proposals to reform the police: Guy Aitchison invites OK readers to add to a list
 

Met orders review into policing of protests: Guy Aitchison comments on Sir Paul Stephenson's suggestions
 

Trapped and beaten by police in Climate Camp: Testimony from Chris Abbott

More in this series

The Damian Green Affair


A Very British Arrest: Laura Sandys on the precedent of her father's 1939 experience.


One reason why the police are dangerous, undemocratic and stupid: Anthony Barnett condemns an attack on democracy.


Questioned by the Met: An MP's experience: Tony Clarke on the crucial differences with his own case.


A Constitutional Failure: The Damian Green case highlights the need for a written constitution, argues Tom Griffin.

Immigration islands


The Return of Enoch: Enoch Powell's repatriation agenda must not be rehabilitated, argues Sunder Katwala.


The ugly economics of immigration: Paul Kingsnorth on why the left is out of step with working class interests.


Immigration and the Politics of Resentment: Shamser Sinha suggests the real problem is a politics that turns neighbour against neighbour.

A neoliberal kingdom


Britain’s neo-liberal state: The financial crisis exposes the need for democratic modernisation, argue Gerry Hassan and Anthony Barnett.


MODERN LIBERTY



Digital Privacy Wars: Guy Aitchison flags up a debate on the threat business poses to digital privacy


The Stalker State: Phil Booth of No2ID on the proposed Comms database


Say 'No' to 42 days: Sign Amnesty's petition against extending pre-charge detention


What do we do now?: Anthony Barnett assesses the stakes for for liberals and radicals in David Davis's campaign against the erosion of rights and liberties


The Abundance of Caution: an authoritative essay by Anthony Barnett sets out the case against 42 Days

Labour After Brown

The next left -Life after the Labour Party: Gerry Hassan sees a historic opportunity for the emergence of a post-New Labour left.

Scottish Labour, where's the coffee?: Gerry Hassan assesses the prospects for Scottish Labour and its new leader.

Lesson for the Left from Chile to Britain: Hassan Akram offers a global perspective on Labour's malaise.

From Milibland to Johnson land?: Jeremy Gilbert argues for Labour without neo-liberalism.

Magical thinking on Britishness: Anthony Barnett critiques Liam Byrne on fraternity.

Rule of law at risk: Geoffrey Bindman calls for a turn away from the marketisation of government.

A new Bill of Rights for Britain?: Guy Aitchison analyses Parliament's proposed new Bill of Rights.

Miliband - by our rights we will know you: Claire O'Brien puts forward a new progressive vision for Labour.

Recapturing liberal Britain: David Marquand challenges Labour's constitutional orthodoxy.

Miliband and the Liberal Democrats: James Graham on the case for realignment.

What is Labour's British story?: Writing from Scotland, Gerry Hassan widens the OurKingdom debate on Labour's future.

This is not Brown's crisis but Britain's: David Marquand says social democracy is bust and Britain may be too.

The Challenges for Miliband's Progressive Fusion: Fabian Society head Sunder Katwala responds to David Miliband.

England Awakes?

England, Britain and multiculturalism: an OurKingdom exchange

A mild awakening?, England's turn? by David Goodhart

Navigation

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

The Lisbon Treaty: Ireland’s awful secret

28 - 04 - 2008
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Catherine Reilly (Dublin, Metro Eireann): Burying bad news: never really a good idea, is it?

Just ask the former British government spin doctor who infamously called 9/11 a good day to "bury" bad news. She lost her job. Or indeed the Irish footballer who, in order to avoid international duty after his girlfriend's apparent miscarriage, ‘killed off' not one but two grandmothers when the media smelled a rat. Those terrace chants and nightclub wind-ups will follow him for life.

Burying bad news, we'll not be having that.

But now the dull spectre of faceless Eurocrats burying bad news has darkened the green fields and concrete playgrounds of Ireland.

It follows thus: two weeks ago, an email leaked to the Daily Mail in London, and originating from the British Foreign Office, suggested that European Commission officials had told Irish politicians that the commission was willing to tone down or delay messages that could be unhelpful during Ireland's Lisbon Treaty referendum campaign. The email, apparently written by a British diplomat in Dublin, also stated that the commission's Vice President Margot Wallström had told Ireland's Minister for Foreign Affairs Dermot Ahern TD (Teachta Dála - member of the Irish parliament) it would delay or tone down unhelpful announcements. Wallström has denied the accusations.

Sinn Féin, whose opposition to the Lisbon Treaty is at odds with the broad cross-party support for it, predictably latched onto the controversy as one would a winning bingo card on a dark, rainy night.

There is growing disquiet in Ireland at ongoing revelations that senior figures within the EU Commission and EU Parliament are attempting to suppress information from the Irish electorate in advance of the referendum on the Lisbon Treaty

remarked the party's MEP Mary Lou McDonald in the EU Parliament this week.

Pushing a few more buttons, she said Irish people "deserve the full and unvarnished truth about EU intentions regarding defence and security, budgetary matters or corporation tax."

Ireland's Taoiseach (prime minister) Bertie Ahern TD, who will prematurely vacate his post on the 6th of May following alleged inconsistencies over his personal finances, has already moved to dismiss the ‘burying bad news' allegations, as has his successor-in-waiting, Tánaiste (deputy prime minister) Brian Cowen TD.

What is most remarkable, however, are the messages still buried within the offending email. Published in full (needs subscription) in The Irish Times last week, the email bluntly stated, "so Irish thought treaty was taken for granted" (sic) when referring to official expectations that the Irish electorate will pass the treaty, and that "most people would not have time to study the text [of the treaty] and would go with the politicians they trusted".

Dublin law lecturer Rossa Fanning, in his opinion piece in The Irish Times on the 22nd of April, honed in on the ‘confusion factor' when he wrote that it is "a safe bet" that very few of the electorate will have read the 272-page treaty by the 12th of June. Fanning added that requesting the electorate to vote on something they have not read, and don't understand, is "of dubious value".

So, the population of the only EU nation scheduled to vote on a treaty setting out the future direction and mechanisms of the EU, is more than a little confused.

How did that get so buried?

Catherine Reilly is deputy editor of Metro Eireann, Ireland's multicultural weekly.

Please support openDemocracy's "Needed: more democracy!" campaign.

We need more of our readers to support the work of helping spread democratic understanding and influence.

If you read openDemocracy and value it please DONATE:

Donate from the UK with Gift Aid

Donate from any other country

Donate via PayPal

This article is published by , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.
NewsCredit This article adheres to the openDemocracy.net principles.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Tore Toivicco (not verified) said:

Sat, 2009-01-31 22:12

Message to irish people about Lisbon treaty:

Lisbon treaty seems to be totally strange and deleting democracy or human rights?

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2008/01/lisbon-treaty-c.html

I’ve read an article which states that police gets rights to shoot people in some situations.

These kind of things are totalitarian politics.

It also propably stops right to go on strike.

http://www.no2lisbon.ie/en/press-centre/entry/160

And all this in whole Europe…

It is sad to notice that all other countries have accepted this treaty, but many governments have not even given people chance to vote about it.

Irish government has given you this right,…anyway it is really strange that Ireland maybe votes again about this, and only after few months?(or 2009?)

EU elite needs this YES, and they have ordered new voting?

If this is true it shows how horrible secret elite rules EU, and what can we expect from the future?
Lisbon treaty is basicly giving ‘Gestapo’-laws to EU-government, if needed?

And they seem to need those laws fast?

Vote NO, and save the world?

F.ex. in many european countries media and politicians has almost 100% ignored discussions about this subject, and people are not even aware about whole thing?

It is also good to remember that USA has now similar ‘mertial laws’ there, after 11th september 2001… ?

EU security officials decide about all security matters of whole EU?

Also there is some things which makes it very difficult for normal people to complain and get things corrected if there is wrongful handlings?

I hope I am wrong, but this whole thing , and how it has been handled seems really wrong? And it is not a democratic way to handle politics.?

http://www.europeanfoundation.org/docs/Treaty%20of%20Lisbon.htm

ps.

I am harassed so much all the time that this writing may include errors.

-Tore Toivicco

Neil Young (not verified) said:

Thu, 2008-05-08 20:47

Hi i just wanted to say that i have no clue as to what the "Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community" is other than what other people's opinions are.

That screams "NO" to me.

Since when did politics become a reality tv show?

Howard (not verified) said:

Tue, 2008-04-29 18:10

The Lisbon Treaty is much longer than 272 pages.

The advocates of the "official truth" elegantly ignore the fact that the new text itself only contains the modifications, deletions and additions to the existing treaties, which altogether add up to ca 3000 pages.

The new form of the old EU constitution called "Lisbon Treaty" - taking over federal state powers and abolishing sovereignty of the member states- is a constitution that is NOT readable in a linear way.

The Lisbon Treaty was NOT meant to be read by anyone, just to be blindly accepted. Because its former lineral version was read and rejected, the new form of the same text would naturally be rejected if it would be readable. If the peoples of Europe would understand that what they sign is the abolition of their national independence, they would not sign it. As simple as that.

Now, only those accept the Lisbon Treaty, the unreadable constitution of a new federal state, who believe in a centralised Europe of blind voters and blind national governments. The less the citizens are aware of the significance of the process Brussels has imposed on Europe the more freedom Brussels will enjoy in finishing what they started.

To learn all details on the Lisbon Treaty - with actual quotes from the text - and its legal implications, please visit the National Platform’s new site:

“Lisbon Treaty Irish Referendum Blog - National Platform”

http://nationalplatform.wordpress.com/

Our blog:

"The Lisbon Treaty Blog"

Facts about the Lisbon Treaty - what political science tells us

http://howardh.wordpress.com/about/

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img> <map>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

What next?

The Convention on Modern Liberty, in London and across the UK attracted more than 1000 people. Find out what happened and what comes next...

Books from Amazon

Email Alerts

Fill in the form below to sign up to our automatic daily alerts, or weekly editorial summary (you will be taken to another page to confirm which options you want).

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future