I went to launch this evening of Keith Ewing's important new book Bonfire of the Liberties
and the Institute of Employment Rights new booklet Ruined Lives on blacklisting in the UK construction industry, also written by Ewing. I was expecting the usual drinks party. But no, it was a serious meeting of trade unionists at the NUJ headquarters. We heard from Henry Porter, who I find it hard to disagree with. He talked about the expansion of what he called "State patrolled space" and how each one of us is being made to feel that both we and everyone else are persons who may "harbour bad intentions". (Or, as John Berger wrote in Meanwhile, we find ourselves living as prisoners.)
Then the photo journalist Marc Vallée spoke about how he discovered the police were storing a private photo-database of everyone then can get pictures of at demonstrations, while intimidating us from taking pictures in public.
Then
Pennie Quinton spoke about how the police used section 44 of the anti-terrorism act to stop her photographing a demonstration outside a London arms fair, even though she was an accredited photographer, and how the House of Lords supported the police and how Liberty helped her and her colleague go to the European Court to get a ruling that the police action was illegal.
Then we heard from Dave Smith of the Blacklist Support Group about how he was blacklisted in the construction industry as a 'troublemaker'. He waved his 30-plus page file. Afterwords he told me that the Home Office has helped to fund a National Dismissal Register which will become another database for employers. I couldn't believe it. We know that the government's aim is to gradually link up its databases, now our health and tax records could be mashed with an informal, private but state sponsored database that reports whether someone has been sacked (implicitly because they are "trouble") that is accessible to companies. I checked on the web when I got back, here is part of a description of it from PersonnelToday:
It appears that an employee can be included on the register if they have caused loss to the relevant organisation or a third party, although it is not clear whether this act needs to be dishonest, or whether a mere mistake is enough.
Since individuals can be included on the register without any trial or criminal conviction, there is a risk that it could be abused by employers, and individuals could be 'blacklisted'. Although an employee has the protection of unfair dismissal claims and could ask for their inclusion on the register to be changed or removed, this takes time, and the damage could already have been done.
This register has the potential to seriously damage an employee's work opportunities
Then we heard from a gentleman who had been subjected to a Control Order and he described his semi-confinement for years without knowing the charges or reasons, until a judge dismissed the case.
What was powerful was hearing at first hand, the testimony and experience of regular people caught up in a machinery driven by our government. The fight for modern liberty is no 'abstract' cause.
Finally, the author himself spoke. There are ten reasons to be worried about what is happening, and they need to be taken together.
1. Increase in stop and search
2. Increase in the powers of search and arrest
3. Increase in surveillance and intrusion by officials
4. Increase in CCTV
5. Massive increase in phone tapping
6. The retention of the illegal DNA database
7. The push for ID cards
8. Militarisation of the police
9. Development of Control Orders
10.Complicity in torture










Comments
This reminds me of the US Declaration of Independence. At what precise point does "a long train of abuses and usurpations", which would surely "reduce [us] under absolute despotism", lead us to conclude that "it is [our] Right, it is [our] Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for [our] future Security"? Has that time yet come? When we finally recognise it, will it already be too late? Is it treason even to raise this question, and to put the faint smell of rebellion in the air? Or is it reasonable to ask at what point we have a right and duty to rise in the just defence of our rights and liberties against a treasonous State which has invaded and usurped them?
This 3 years old article of the German "Die Zeit" (google translation) is scary, showing the degree of liberty loss: http://bit.ly/aaEN1b
One of Anthony Barnett's great attractions is his innocent naivete.
The good news is that this leads to perfectly justified occasional outrage on his part. In turn, this causes him to take up angry cudgels. This is very good news for democracy.
The bad news for Anthony is that many of us on the Left warned of this logical development at the start of the current version of the Rightist nightmare decades ago. We were disbelieved. Now it is here and getting worse almost by the day.
The Even More Bad News is that there is - once again, Anthony - nothing new about any of this. All you had to do was analyse the activities of the old Economic League and - just one example - David Hart. There are plenty of others for those who care to look. Did you really think such people would simply fade quietly into the background?
As I have said before, now the Cold War has gone capitalist protagonists must of necessity find a new enemy. Eventually they always turn inwards anyway, but it has become more intense with the abandonment of the old Warsaw bloc. Somehow, Al Qeda hasn't quite performed according to its allotted role.
You can bet your bottom Euro there's some right-wing crackpot in the "intelligence" services monitoring not only this website but the activities of people like the worthy Anthony. Did Peter Wright not explain this clearly enough in Spycatcher? Have not other whistle blowers not made it abundantly obvious what is and would be happening?
The difference between me and Anthony is that I expect this as a routine offshoot of capitalism.So I admire his outrage but find his naivete sad and eventually ineffectual.
After all, he can't say he didn't get enough warnings.
"there is - once again, Anthony - nothing new about any of this."
In these few words Mark "told you so" Jones sums up all his dozens of comments in OurKingdom. "All I had to do" he says" is "analyse the activities of the old Economic League". Well, in fact I didn't have to "analyse" it, I was on their blacklist and proudly claimed my T-Shirt when it was exposed.
One problem with "told you so" Jones is that he never adds a link, offers a specific new fact, examines what is happening at the moment, makes a witty comment that helps any argument along. The comments from his world of "it was ever thus" seem tailor-made to induce passivity and fatalism. I don't understand why he doesn't fall asleep writing them.
Yes, I knew you were on their black list, Anthony. That's why I mentioned it.
I know how to keep you awake and away from the mirror.
The world, dear Anthony, is much like it has always been. You have not and will not discover anything new.
There are no "new politics" and no "new constituencies." That's all bull. The same type of people hold the majority of wealth and power. The same people are put upon.
What was true a thousand years ago is true now: Tinkering is useless, as are platitudes.
When I see you and the rest of the Our Kingdom crew on, say, a five years long programme to help organise and support working-class people and their interests, then maybe, just maybe, I will think you have seen the light. Until then, I assure you you are whistling Dixie in New York.
But that's life.
Post new comment