These and hundreds of other examples from the OpenNet Initiative’s latest research are but a few pieces of evidence of what has become an alarming trend: motivated by short-term security and cultural concerns, dozens of governments are carving up and corralling the once seamless Internet environment.Like any other commons, the global communications environment is a finite public good whose maintenance as a valuable resource depends on sustained contributions of individuals worldwide. And yet citizens are having their legitimate contributions stifled by fickle governments who are threatened by freedom of speech and access to information.Fortunately, there are many ways to begin to rescue the global communications environment. We need to encourage the research and development of tools (like the censorship-evading software psiphon) that support the Internet’s open architecture. We need to put pressure on governments that censor and the companies who assist them, promoting laws from the domestic to the international spheres that restrain their shortsighted motives. And we need to raise global awareness that if we, citizens of the earth, are ever to solve our many shared problems successfully, we need an unfettered planetary communications environment with which to do so.Ron Deibert is speaking on Wednesday 6 June at “Some People Think the Internet is a Bad Thing: The Struggle for Free Expression in Cyberspace”, an Amnesty International event sponsored by the Observer. The event examines the future of free speech online - governments’ attempts to restrict expression and information on the Internet and how web users are harnessing the power of the internet to resist them. It is webcasted live here.



Comments
Post new comment