Skip to content

Covid-19 and the injustice of life in the favelas and urban peripheries in Rio de Janeiro

“Once more, the population of the slums and urban peripheries are subjected to intersecting types of violence that, from our point of view, need to be confronted”, says FASE’s team in Rio de Janeiro. Español Português

Covid-19 and the injustice of life in the favelas and urban peripheries in Rio de Janeiro
April 13, 2020 - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - To make up for the absence of the State health officials, residents of the Santa Marta favela, in Botafogo, in southern Rio, gather to clean their homes in the favela. | Ellan Lustosa/Zuma Press/PA Images
Published:

In just a few weeks, the population in the slums (favelas) and urban peripheries of Rio de Janeiro has seen the State governor Wilson Witzel (of the conservative Social Christian Party) emerge on to the national political scene with some degree of common sense concerning the pandemic of Covid-19, that is, if compared to the position taken by Jair Bolsonaro. Contrary to the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO), the Brazilian President has been attending public events without any protection and downplaying the risks of the coronavirus, saying “it’s nothing but a little flu”.

The importance of the measures taken by the governor are undeniable. He has communicated to the population the health risks derived from COVID-19 and, then took legal measures to limit the traffic between the state’s countryside and metropolitan region. However, when we look at the cuts in state’s public budget, his disregard for the most vulnerable people who need social and basic income policies, particularly in the face of the health emergency, becomes clear.

Witzel considerably restricted the budget amid the pandemic, which directly affected social spending linked to housing and education. It is also worth noticing the contingency plan of R$7,6 billion made in the budget under the justification of the drop of oil prices and of the need of shift the budget to face Covid-19. The State Welfare Housing Fund, for example, also lost 29% of its budget, which could have been used to improve conditions in the slums. What is striking is that with the exception of health, the only sector not subject to budget cuts is Public Security (Military and Civil Police, Civil Defense, Firefighters and the “Police Present” Program). The decision of where to cut and where to invest budget is another example of the genocide policies of this government.