Skip to content

Uber and Deliveroo’s ‘charter of good work’ is nothing but fairwashing

We can't let companies that profit from undermining labour protections define what 'good work' is.

Uber and Deliveroo’s ‘charter of good work’ is nothing but fairwashing
People protest outside TFL offices in central London during a demonstration against private hire firm Uber's appeal against employment tribunal ruling over holiday pay. | Image: Victoria Jones/PA Archive/PA Images
Published:

Every week seems to witness a new tragedy in the gig economy. Gig workers are injured and killed without the platforms that they work for acknowledging or shouldering any responsibility. Many workers take on these risks for below the minimum wage.

It is therefore noteworthy that the CEOs of Uber, Deliveroo and four other large platforms have come together to “strengthen workers’ rights” with a ‘Charter of principles for good platform work’ that was published at the World Economic Forum gathering in Davos.

This kind of corporate strategy isn’t new, and similar tactics have been deployed in many industries. In 2017, Sainsbury’s announced that its own-brand teas would no longer carry the Fairtrade label. Once positioning themselves as the world’s largest retailer of Fairtrade products, the supermarket giant said they would be certifying their tea supply chain under a cheaper in-house scheme, ‘Fairly Traded’, which mimicked some of Fairtrade’s key features, but was less accountable to farmers. Sainsbury’s was betting that consumers wouldn’t have the time or inclination to scrutinise the difference.