Skip to content

Unitary taxation of multinationals: what it is and why it matters

Corporate tax avoidance is costing countries $100-240 billion a year in lost revenue. The case for a new approach is overwhelming.

Unitary taxation of multinationals: what it is and why it matters
Image: Harshil Shah, CC BY-ND 2.0
Published:

In its manifesto for the forthcoming general election the UK Labour Party has included a commitment to tax multinational enterprises (MNEs) as unitary firms. The commitment adopts recommendations put forward in a report by Danny Bertossa and myself, so naturally we are pleased.

Some have challenged whether this is feasible, and the estimates of the benefits. The report itself provides a full explanation, so anyone interested should read it, which perhaps not all the critics have. Here I will address the two main questions that have been raised: could a UK government do this, and what would be the benefits?

Those who have been following the project on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) will know that it is now at a crucial stage. Proposals have been put forward that would radically alter practices that have become normalised over the past 20 years, which have greatly facilitated tax avoidance by multinationals.