Of the many strange aspects of the referendum debate is how little stress the Remain camp gives to EU protection of human rights.
Mutual security and deterrence with fewer risks has been a conscious, crucial, and underestimated role of the EU. A Brexit vote would put this at risk and make Britain less secure.
Our support of Leave wishes to urgently engage with an unconditional polemic against an increasingly centralized EU, an inherently authoritarian political and economic structure which is beyond rectification from within.
A serious attempt at democracy, in the sense of being able to influence the decisions that affect our lives, can only be done through solidarity with those in the European Union. Interview.
Military and political leaders who might seriously threaten the UK are simply unlikely to be deterred by the threat to destroy their cities.
There is an ironic parallel in the methodology of emotion and national dignity employed by both the left-wing Syriza in Greece and the right wing leave camp in Britain.
B in Brexit stands for Boris and his overweening ambition. But R is for Racism, the method through which Vote Leave aims to achieve the political upset of the century.
If these proposals become law, then, over time, the fee-paying student will become the human equivalent of black gold.
The idea behind the referendum has never been to offer the people a debate between a neoliberal Europe and a social Britain, but between a neoliberal UK within a neoliberal EU, and a neoliberal UK outside a neoliberal EU.
Everywhere, people are increasingly hostile towards whoever wants them to vote just for the sake of stability and out of fear of a jump into the unknown.
Transnational marriage abandonment lies at the intersect of immigration and patriarchal control, allowing abusers and states to enjoy impunity for violations committed against women in transnational spaces.
