Part of the openDemocracy Network

The British Crisis

Do the public really want to change ‘the system’?: Stuart Wilks-Heeg presents polling evidence
 

Don't trust MPs' constitutional poker: Guy Aitchison supports the call for a citizens' convention
 

Brown's 'National Council for Democratic Renewal': Anthony Barnett on the Prime Minister's desperate proposal
 

More in this series

Who Polices The Police?

Open letter to the BBC: Guy Aitchison and Stuart White raise serious concerns with the BBC's coverage of G20 policing
 

The Met must stop spinning G20 policing: Defend Peaceful Protest on the Met's response to its critics
 

Met watchdog criticises G20 policing: Anna Bragga reports on the MPA meeting
 

Our campaign to defend peaceful protest launches: Guy Aitchison and Andy May have some questions for the Met following the policing of the G20
 

The architectural photographer as terrorist: Edward Denison recounts his detention for photographing a police station
 

Letter to the Beeb: Guy Aitchison responds to a complacent and misleading feature on "kettling" for the BBC website
 

Not "kettling" but "bubbling": Clare Coatman on polarised views of police and protesters
 

Kettling - another special relationship: Charles Shaw's eye-witness account of the practice's US debut
 

Practical proposals to reform the police: Guy Aitchison invites OK readers to add to a list
 

Met orders review into policing of protests: Guy Aitchison comments on Sir Paul Stephenson's suggestions
 

Trapped and beaten by police in Climate Camp: Testimony from Chris Abbott

More in this series

The Damian Green Affair


A Very British Arrest: Laura Sandys on the precedent of her father's 1939 experience.


One reason why the police are dangerous, undemocratic and stupid: Anthony Barnett condemns an attack on democracy.


Questioned by the Met: An MP's experience: Tony Clarke on the crucial differences with his own case.


A Constitutional Failure: The Damian Green case highlights the need for a written constitution, argues Tom Griffin.

Immigration islands


The Return of Enoch: Enoch Powell's repatriation agenda must not be rehabilitated, argues Sunder Katwala.


The ugly economics of immigration: Paul Kingsnorth on why the left is out of step with working class interests.


Immigration and the Politics of Resentment: Shamser Sinha suggests the real problem is a politics that turns neighbour against neighbour.

A neoliberal kingdom


Britain’s neo-liberal state: The financial crisis exposes the need for democratic modernisation, argue Gerry Hassan and Anthony Barnett.


MODERN LIBERTY



Digital Privacy Wars: Guy Aitchison flags up a debate on the threat business poses to digital privacy


The Stalker State: Phil Booth of No2ID on the proposed Comms database


Say 'No' to 42 days: Sign Amnesty's petition against extending pre-charge detention


What do we do now?: Anthony Barnett assesses the stakes for for liberals and radicals in David Davis's campaign against the erosion of rights and liberties


The Abundance of Caution: an authoritative essay by Anthony Barnett sets out the case against 42 Days

Labour After Brown

The next left -Life after the Labour Party: Gerry Hassan sees a historic opportunity for the emergence of a post-New Labour left.

Scottish Labour, where's the coffee?: Gerry Hassan assesses the prospects for Scottish Labour and its new leader.

Lesson for the Left from Chile to Britain: Hassan Akram offers a global perspective on Labour's malaise.

From Milibland to Johnson land?: Jeremy Gilbert argues for Labour without neo-liberalism.

Magical thinking on Britishness: Anthony Barnett critiques Liam Byrne on fraternity.

Rule of law at risk: Geoffrey Bindman calls for a turn away from the marketisation of government.

A new Bill of Rights for Britain?: Guy Aitchison analyses Parliament's proposed new Bill of Rights.

Miliband - by our rights we will know you: Claire O'Brien puts forward a new progressive vision for Labour.

Recapturing liberal Britain: David Marquand challenges Labour's constitutional orthodoxy.

Miliband and the Liberal Democrats: James Graham on the case for realignment.

What is Labour's British story?: Writing from Scotland, Gerry Hassan widens the OurKingdom debate on Labour's future.

This is not Brown's crisis but Britain's: David Marquand says social democracy is bust and Britain may be too.

The Challenges for Miliband's Progressive Fusion: Fabian Society head Sunder Katwala responds to David Miliband.

England Awakes?

England, Britain and multiculturalism: an OurKingdom exchange

A mild awakening?, England's turn? by David Goodhart

Navigation

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

The perils of a progressive English nationalist

Tom Griffin, 27 - 08 - 2008
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Tom Griffin (London, OK): Over at Comment Is Free, Paul Kingsnorth reflects on his recent OurKingdom debate with Vron Ware, and re-states his left-wing case for English nationalism:

because the English, unlike the Scottish, the Welsh or the people of Northern Ireland, have no political focus for their concerns, they have nowhere to turn to express them. What can happen when such a focus does exist can be seen north of the border. The last decade has seen a transformation of Scotland, as a direct result of the creation of a Scottish parliament.

Of course, the Scottish Parliament is itself the product of decades of political mobilisation. Scottish nationalists had no political focus either until they created one. Perhaps the first step for progressive English nationalists is to figure out how to follow that example.

Please support openDemocracy's "Needed: more democracy!" campaign.

We need more of our readers to support the work of helping spread democratic understanding and influence.

If you read openDemocracy and value it please DONATE:

Donate from the UK with Gift Aid

Donate from any other country

Donate via PayPal

This article is published by Tom Griffin, and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.
NewsCredit This article adheres to the openDemocracy.net principles.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Paul Kingsnorth (not verified) said:

Mon, 2008-09-01 11:01

Sorry Jon, that's not fair. I did not 'very crudely caricature' Vron. I quoted her, quite correctly. She wrote that my version of civic nationalism was 'complicit with racism' and that it was the 'duty' of those who considered themselves anti-racist to 'reject' it.

She couldn't have been clearer, and neither could I. Civic English nationalism is designed at least in part specifically to combat racism, so I won't accept this. 'What it means to have an anti-racist politics', meanwhile, is not defined by you or Vron Ware or anyone else, but is entirely personal. At the heart of it is an opposition to racism. Beyond that, you may complicate it all you like, but that's your affair.

I never claimed Vron had called me a racist, incidentally, so I'm not sure why you drew out that last paragraph.

alex_buchan (not verified) said:

Thu, 2008-08-28 19:20

Arthur Aughey’s comments are not entirely disinterested but rather reflected the view of the unionist establishment on the level of threat posed by English nationalism. However, the poverty of the response of Clark and others shows that the establishment has lost the patrician confidence it had before the principle of the UK as a unitary state was breached by the creation of competing national legislatures. Paradoxically it was Tony Blair’s insistence on referenda that gave a formal stamp to what was always going to be the case in regard to Scotland: that the Scottish Parliament would become entrenched whether the constitution was formally federal or not.

As there is no going back on devolution there is no reason to believe the English question will be significantly eased by any of the measures proposed so far. In fact most are likely to merely draw more attention to the need for further and more profound changes. So a dynamic is at play and this may be the thing that forces English society address the issues outlined by britologywatch

“For the English, choosing to be English as opposed to British really means entering a new phase of existence as a nation, and abandoning the assumed glories and glamour of Britishness - perhaps for good. It's actually an existential choice: do we want to be English or do we want to be British? Politically, that choice is increasingly being made for us by the other nations of the UK. But until we embrace Englishness psychologically and existentially, we'll cling on to Britishness even amid the growing disintegration of Britain as an objective political reality.”

I think this is the crux of the issue, but pressures are likely to push this process along.

Tom Griffin said:

Thu, 2008-08-28 14:35

Saying that England should follow the lengthy Scots path (there was no health apartheid then!) strikes me as rather an odd concept.

Chris, the Scottish path certainly was lengthy, but are English nationalists currently on a path that will deliver progress more quickly? At the moment, the CEP notwithstanding, I'm not sure they are, and Arthur Aughey's description of English nationalism as a 'mood not a movement' is a telling one.

The Cornish Democrat said:

Thu, 2008-08-28 12:26
For someone who as expressed a desire for progressive Cornish nationalists to lend their (limited I know) support its a shame Paul didn't even mention us once in his article.
It's not that he is not aware of the Cornish question and I don't expect 'Cornwall' in to be in every one of his sentences, so perhaps Paul could explain why we don't even get a nod.

Hendre (not verified) said:

Thu, 2008-08-28 08:30

Chris Abbot

You're forgetting the Parliament of Northern Ireland which sat between 1921 and 1972.

Uniformity has never been a feature of the United Kingdom. Our different arrangements derive either from the 1707 Treaty of Union or that political mobilisation mentioned in the original post. You seem to imply that constitutionality was all very well for the Welsh and the Scots but that the English should be allowed to circumvent it.

As for the postcode lottery on medical treatment, it predates devolution and in a way extends beyond it. What is the more pertinent question we should be asking ourselves? Why does provision in Scotland differ from the rest of the UK in certain respects or why does its provision mirror more closely that enjoyed by our European neighbours, the USA, Australia etc.?

Chris Abbott (not verified) said:

Wed, 2008-08-27 17:28

Sorry, Tom, but the original Union documents stated that there would be one parliament forevermore. Now we have a situation of various levels of elitism - differing forms of devolution - from a Scots Parliament to Welsh and Northern Ireland assemblies, but no national body at all for England.

I think the situation is a little more complex - and might I say twisted - than you seem to grasp.

We now have previously unimaginable inequalities running rampant in the so-called "UK". Saying that England should follow the lengthy Scots path (there was no health apartheid then!) strikes me as rather an odd concept. And worrying. So people should continue to suffer in England for want of medications available on the NHS in Scotland, should they?

Surely, the Government should never have allowed asymmetric devolution in the first place? And the sooner all nations are equal the better?

Keith McBurney said:

Wed, 2008-08-27 16:11

Its not race i hate, but the racist in us all.

It's an instinct that needs self-control.

Jon Bright26 (not verified) said:

Wed, 2008-08-27 15:21

He also continues to very crudely caricature what Vron Ware said about him, claiming that she accused him of being "complicit with racism". While she did use those words in the passage her point was about what it means to have an anti-racist politics. She also said this about Paul:

If I thought he was being racist I would say so, but it is a serious charge and I don't for a minute think he is, and I have read his work carefully.

Toque said:

Wed, 2008-08-27 13:08

It's funny because I was discussing this with Paul a couple of weeks ago and I mentioned to him that I had been called a race-traitor and wigga by people on the right, and a racist and BNP sympathiser by people on the left.

Fast-forward a week and Paul gets called a race-traitor.  I sent him a congratulatory email to welcome him to the prestigious club. 

aedis (not verified) said:

Wed, 2008-08-27 10:39

Scottish nationalism has had different focuses from the Treaty of Union to the present.

First of all, there was Jacobism in the 18th century, the Chartists in the early 19th century, the Home Rule campaigners of the 19th and early 20th century, leading to the formation of the SNP in 1934.

Nearly 300 years to get a parliament back!

Lets hope the English nationalists have a shorter route.

Hendre (not verified) said:

Wed, 2008-08-27 08:51

“The last decade has seen a transformation of Scotland, as a direct result of the creation of a Scottish parliament.”

I haven’t been to Scotland for a few years so perhaps I shouldn’t comment but I’m always rather sceptical when I hear English writers talk of post-devolution transformations. What has been transformed? Scotland itself or English perceptions of it?

There seems to be a tendency to attribute to devolution such developments as a separate political culture or establishment. These are not the results of devolution but the prerequisites.

What really has shaken up the political culture in the devolved administrations is proportional representation.

britologywatch said:

Wed, 2008-08-27 07:40

The situation is, however, somewhat different; so that drawing parallels with, and learning lessons from, the Scottish experience is fraught with difficulties. In some respects, the new Scottish self-awareness and national focus results from having defined and reaffirmed an identity that is independent and differentiated from that of 'Britain' seen essentially as a trope for England. So it's easier for the Scots to be proud Scots because they have a more powerful neighbour to react against.

For the English, by contrast, defining an English identity distinct from the British identity and state is a much more agonising and internal process in every sense: nationally, politically and psychologically. This is because of the familiar confusion / conflation of the English and British identities. For the English, choosing to be English as opposed to British really means entering a new phase of existence as a nation, and abandoning the assumed glories and glamour of Britishness - perhaps for good. It's actually an existential choice: do we want to be English or do we want to be British? Politically, that choice is increasingly being made for us by the other nations of the UK. But until we embrace Englishness psychologically and existentially, we'll cling on to Britishness even amid the growing disintegration of Britain as an objective political reality.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img> <map>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

What next?

The Convention on Modern Liberty, in London and across the UK attracted more than 1000 people. Find out what happened and what comes next...

Books from Amazon

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future