Lina Abirafeh

3 October 2005
Lina Abirafeh is a gender expert and PhD Candidate. She is currently the Senior Gender Officer and Head of the Gender Section at the Joint Electoral Management Body Secretariat (JEMBS) in the United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS). She is working to engage women in all aspects of Afghanistan’s parliamentary elections.
Lina has worked in Afghanistan since 2002, first as Country Director of Women for Women International, an international NGO based in Washington, DC and then as an independent consultant and gender advisor working for the International Women’s Forum (IWF), Afghan Center, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES), International Finance Corporation (IFC) and others. Lina’s previous experience includes four years with the World Bank in Washington, DC and gender work in Morocco with Catholic Relief Services and Bangladesh with Grameen Bank.
Lina holds an MA from Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) and is in the process of completing her PhD under the auspices of the London School of Economics (LSE) Development Studies Institute. Her focus is the effects of gender-focused international aid in Afghanistan. She has written and published extensively on gender issues, particularly women in Afghanistan (for example: here).
Lina is interested in discussing the possible negative externalities of gender-focused international aid in post-conflict contexts. What does 1325 say about aid that doesn’t necessarily make things better for women? And, how can we engage GENDER issues in the genuine sense of the term without conflating “gender” with “women”? Are there ways to also work with men in the context of 1325?

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData