In a continuing discussion on the merits of the arguments put by David King and Benny Peiser (following comments by Charlie Kronick here), Alexander Bates, who says he is Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of Australia, writes:
I was struck by the fact that Sir David was acting as an advocate, not a dispassionate academic observer. Phrases such as, 'beyond any reasonable doubt' have no place in a paper that purports to be a dispassionate discussion of the evidence. (continues here)
Caspar Henderson
