Home

A response to David King

12 May 2005
In a continuing discussion on the merits of the arguments put by David King and Benny Peiser (following comments by Charlie Kronick here), Alexander Bates, who says he is Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of Australia, writes:

I was struck by the fact that Sir David was acting as an advocate, not a dispassionate academic observer. Phrases such as, 'beyond any reasonable doubt' have no place in a paper that purports to be a dispassionate discussion of the evidence. (continues here)

Caspar Henderson

Sign the petition: save our Freedom of Information

The UK government is running a secretive unit inside Michael Gove’s Cabinet Office that’s accused of ‘blacklisting’ journalists and hiding ‘sensitive’ information from the public. Experts say they’re breaking the law – and it’s an assault on our right to know what our government is doing.

We’re not going to let it stand. We’re launching a legal battle – but we also need a huge public outcry, showing that thousands back our call for transparency. Will you add your name?

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData