Inhofe and truth

18 April 2005
On 8 April, Senator James M. Inhofe (R. Okla), delivered the first of four speeches on climate change on the floor of the US Senate. A transcript of the speech is not available on his web site, but can be read here.

John Sterman of MIT, who kindly drew my attention to the speech, comments that it has been carefully written.

Sterman is right, but there I think there are some holes. For example, near the top, Senator Inhofe says that "More than 17,000 scientists have signed the Oregon Petition, stating that fears of global warming are groundless".

This looks very much like a reference to a 1998 petition, supposedly signed by 17,000 scientists, which questioned the evidence for global warming.

As I wrote in Globolog a couple of years ago, it later emerged that the petition had been circulated by an obscure organisation based in a shed in the backwoods of Oregon and had nothing to do with the [US] National Academy of Sciences. Signatories allegedly included such authorities on climate change as Ginger Spice, a British pop star, and the doctors from M.A.S.H, a [fictional] TV drama series. (This did not, reportedly, stop Exxon Chairman Lee Raymond referring approvingly to the petition in 2002).

So, is it? Or has there been another Oregon Petition, also signed by 17,000 "scientists"?

As John Sterman says, "the scientific community has a lot of work to do to build public understanding of the science and the degree to which there is uncertainty over it".

Realclimate.org has this analysis of a 4 Jan 2005 speech by Senator Inhofe.

Caspar Henderson

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData