What Iranian newspapers are saying about the election

10 May 2005

E'temad [moderate]: "A minority of 15 per cent of the people could reach a majority of 85 per cent in the Majlis and if the people do not take part in the presidential election, it is possible that this happen again. If in the presidential election 60 to 70 per cent of the people do not cast their votes, how can Iran deal with its external threats?"

Aftab-e-Yazd [reformist]: "Considering the current sensitive situation of Iran and foreign threats, many experts believe that a high turnout by the people is an absolute necessity [To reach that] everyone should be able to run in the election and the people should make sure that the next president is the second position of the country and if he has different plans and ideas from those of the seventh Majlis, he should be able to pursue his plans, not to be challenged by the Majlis."

Keyhan [hard-line pro-Khamene'i]: "Iranians have experienced the previous reformist [Khatami] and construction [Rafsanjani] governments and certainly they are looking for some new figures. If we are looking for a high turnout by the people, the new young figures should run in the election. The candidacy of certain figures, who have shown whatever management power that they had and now do not have any new plans or policy and perhaps they are tired and not patient enough, cannot motivate people to take part in the election."

Siyasat-e-Ruz [conservative]: "Adopting a specific literature, certain figures are trying to show that the country is in a critical situation, it is on the verge of a cliff and the political disputes have reached a sensitive point in order to prove that they are the only ones who can rescue the country. It is the culmination of being dishonest to the people and proves that it is an opportunistic attempt to cheat them."

From: Iranian Liberation

Can there be a green populist project on the Left?

Many on the Left want to return to a politics based on class, not populism. They point to Left populist parties not reaching their goals. But Chantal Mouffe argues that as the COVID-19 pandemic has put the need for protection from harm at the top of the agenda, a Left populist strategy is now more relevant than ever.

Is this an opportunity for a realignment around a green democratic transformation?

Join us for a free live discussion on Thursday 22 October, 5pm UK time/12pm EDT.

Hear from:

Paolo Gerbaudo Sociologist and political theorist, director of the Centre for Digital Culture at King’s College London and author of ‘The Mask and the Flag: Populism and Global Protest’ and ‘The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy’, and of the forthcoming ‘The Great Recoil: Politics After Populism and Pandemic’.

Chantal Mouffe Emeritus Professor of Political Theory at the University of Westminster in London. Her most recent books are ‘Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically’, ‘Podemos. In the Name of the People’ and ‘For a Left Populism’.

Spyros A. Sofos Researcher and research coordinator at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Lund University and author of ‘Nation and Identity in Contemporary Europe’, ‘Tormented by History’ and ‘Islam in Europe: Public Spaces and Civic Networks'.

Chair: Walid el Houri Researcher, journalist and filmmaker based between Berlin and Beirut. He is partnerships editor at openDemocracy and lead editor of its North Africa, West Asia project.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData