Reformists and The Sovereign's Decree

24 May 2005

On 23 May, upon the recommendation of the Parliament's Speaker, Ayatollah Khamenei ordered the Council of Guardians to review the candidacy of two candidates that had been rejected by the Guardians. He, in effect, ordered the Guardians to accept them. One of these two candidates is a former member of President Khatami's cabinet, the pro-reform candidate, Dr. Moin.

Moin, during his campaign had indicated that his platform rejects the concept of "Sovereign's Decree". The question of "Sovereign Decree", and the reformists' opposition has been a controversial issue during the Khatami's mandate. It has exposed deep differences between the rival conservative/fundamentalist factions and the reformist factions of the regime.

The "Sovereign's Decree" is a constitutional practice that accords with the authoritarian components of the Islamic Republic's Constitution, derived from Section 110. Accordingly, the Supreme Leader has the right to directly interfere, through such sovereign decrees, in the daily activities of the elected institutions (such as the Parliament and the Presidency) and un-elected institutions of the government (such as the Guardian Council).

Perhaps, the most important example of such an exercise can be seen in the Supreme Leader's 2001 direct order to the Parliament to withdraw the progressive, anti-conservative Press Law Reform Bill from the Parliament's agenda permanently. The Supreme Leader, in so doing, cited "expediency/exigency".

"Expediency/exigency" is another fundamental concept in the Islamic Republic's Constitution. According to this concept, which has been repeatedly mentioned in sections 110, 112, and 177 of the Constitution, "the expediency of the regime in matters that are critical to its survival allows the Supreme Leader to ignore certain constitutional practices and thereby issue "Sovereign Decrees". In his most famous interference in the Parliament's deliberation on reforming the draconian Press Law to a more liberal one, the Supreme Leader justified his interference as follows: "If the enemies infiltrate our Press, this will be a big danger to our security".

Sharam Koldi

Read more at Sharam Koldi's blog S'can Iranic.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData