Opinion: Moin Should Leave

27 May 2005

The Reformist camp is ideological. It is based upon the perception that major political institutions need restructuring. It requires change in Iran's power dynamics. However, practically, it cannot succeed in a conservative dominated Majlis and with a Council of Guardians and Velayet-e-faghi that care nothing for reform, but to maintain power. Moin has to recognize this and must know that practically, even if he were to become president it would completely eliminate any backing the reformists currently have, including his ability to bring about change.


On the other hand, to step down, in complete defiance of Khamenai's charge would be a significant step that could lead to the political empowerment of Reformists. Social discontent with Khatami arose in large part because he would not take aggressive measures to defy Iran's political institutions. Khatami would not step down when urged by his constituents when, time after time, his political proposals were vetoed by the Council of Guardians.


By embracing Khamenai's decision, Moin does nothing more then implicitly accept the current political situation. Worst, it does more to collapse the distinctions between conservatives and reformists amongst the population. This is a far greater threat to the reformist parties then to be politically disenfranchised.


The success of the reformists is on maintaining and spreading their ideology, not upon securing seats in the Majlis or Presidency. Only by stepping down and not accepting his certification to run will Moin be effective in empowering his party.

Why we're suing over the £23m NHS data deal with 'spy tech' firm Palantir

Right as the NHS battles 'vaccine hesitancy', why is the government giving a CIA-backed firm – whose spyware has been accused of creating ‘racist’ feedback loops in US policing – a major, long-term role in handling our personal health information, and in England's cherished NHS?

Get the inside story from the journalists and lawyers battling to force transparency from the government on what they're doing with public money – and our health records.

Join us for this free event on 4 March at 5pm UK time/12pm EST.

Hear from:

Cori Crider Lawyer, investigator and co-founder of Foxglove, a non-profit that seeks to make the use of technology fair for everyone

Caroline Molloy Editor ourNHS and openDemocracyUK

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief, openDemocracy

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData