Home

Case against Orhan Pamuk dropped

23 January 2006
Today’s news that the case against Orhan Pamuk for "denigrating Turkishness" has been thrown out by a court in Istanbul comes as small consolation for the many other individuals in Turkey awaiting hearings of their cases under the same article Article 301 of the new penal code. Amnesty International opposes the article on the grounds that it poses a grave threat to freedom of expression, a freedom that Turkey, as a state party to both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, has a duty to uphold.

Article 301 is worded in such broad and nebulous terms that it can be (and indeed is being) used to criminalize a wide range of peacefully-expressed dissenting opinions. Amnesty International has received reports of all sorts of people being prosecuted under the article since it came into force on 1 June 2005. These people include not only writers and journalists, but also publishers and human rights defenders. Even two former members of the Turkish Human Rights Advisory Council have not escaped its clutches for publishing a report on minority and cultural rights as commissioned by the Prime Minister himself.

Orhan Pamuk’s case was reportedly dropped after the Ministry of Justice wrote to the relevant court, which had been awaiting the authorization of the ministry, declaring that under the new law it no longer had any legal competence to give such authorization. Although this is clearly good news for Orhan Pamuk, it leaves unanswered the question of what will happen to those other cases once the issue fades from the media spotlight. Dropping cases one by one is clearly both untenable and unsatisfactory; these cases should not have been opened in the first place. Amnesty International urges the Turkish authorities to take seriously their commitments to freedom of expression and abolish Article 301 in its entirety.

From: Campaigner, Turkey Team, Amnesty International Secretariat.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData