Home

Democracy in Iran, blog responses to Sazegara

15 April 2005

openDemocracy’s article series on Iran is making some waves in the blogosphere, and it seems to be mainly pro-military invasion bloggers who have latched on to it (at least on English-language blogs). Has calling for democracy in Iran become too Right-sounding to the anti-war Left?

Also check out this moving letter to Mohsen Sazegara from an Iranian openDemocracy reader.

At The Word Unheard, there is an overview of openDemocracy’s Iran debate. Blogger “USMC_Vet” seems sympathetic to Kaveh Ehsani’s argument for peaceful protest but says, “From a standpoint of American security, leaving the framework of this regime of lunatics in place is not an option. Removing them without considerable bloodshed is likely not a possiblity.”

Ubi Libertas takes a similar stance, especially disagreeing with Mohsen Sazegara on the importance of support from intellectuals, writers, and artists: “If the last few years teach us anything it is that poets, novelists, philosophers, playwrights, and singers matter not at all. They're too busy stroking each other to do any actual good in the world. The best we can hope for from them is that they don't actively hinder change, and even that modest hope is often frustrated.”

The Pseudo Magazine applauds Sazegara’s efforts, and practically predicts a Marxist revolution in educated, well-informed and internet-connected Iranian society: “The people will have their voices heard. Woe betide anyone who stands in their way.”

Regime Change Iran comments on the unlikely rumour among Iranian ex-patriates that Sazegara is “an agent of the regime sent to undermine their efforts.”

And Ukranian-American, “Aussiegirl” in Washinton D.C. says Sazegar’s online referendum petition reminds her of something George Bush once said: “Read the referendum -- and see if it doesn't remind you of an American document we all celebrate on the Fourth of July. Freedom is a wonderful thing -- and it appears that the craving for it is universal, as George Bush has repeatedly stated.”

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData