Employee rights for terrorists

10 May 2005

Keep your eyes peeled for Luis Posada Carriles. Anyone who the New York Times says could “create tension between the politics of the global war on terrorism and the ghosts of the cold war on communism” has got to be worth following.

Posada is a Cuban exile. Six weeks ago, he illegally entered the United States and looks set to prove a mighty headache for Washington. Why? Because Hugo Chavez, iconoclastic President of Venezuela and scourge of the United States, is trying to extradite him. The charge? Bombing out the sky a Cubana Airlines in 1976 and killing 73 people – one of several bombing escapades, it appears, for Signor Posada, including a 2000 effort to snuff The Beard himself.

It also seems likely that the airline bombing was planned by Posada at a June 1976 meeting in Santo Domingo along with the Washington murder of Orlando Letelier, former foreign minister of Chile, and American Ronni Moffit, which occurred two weeks prior to the Cubana bomb.

Like most of us, Posada wants political asylum in the United States. Only, he has a case. His lawyer says he was on the CIA payroll between 1961-67 and, according to US government records, “kept in close touch with the agency after leaving it”, including when he was in the Venezuelan intelligence service and a private dick in Caracas.


President Bush must choose whether to embrace him, arrest him, or send him to Hugo.

In classic NYT language “A grant of asylum could invite charges that the Bush administration is compromising its principle that no nation should harbor suspected terrorists.”

Then there’s all that Cuban-American dosh that Bush and his brother Jeb don’t want to risk losing by deporting Posada.

There’s principles. And then there’s the past.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData