Home

Accountability is not a blame game

7 September 2005

Accountability is not, as President Bush has described it, a “blame game”. It is a fundamental requirement of a functioning democracy. With his announcement that he himself would lead the investigation into Hurricane Katrina, President Bush moved this week’s events from tragedy to farce. To investigate a set of events in which his own administration has received more criticism than followed either 9/11 or the war in Iraq, given this administration’s track record on deflecting criticism and distorting public truth, is to add mockery to the misery of the victims.

Katrina has exposed so many questions about the US state, the condition of its government and the hidden costs of ideological hostility to the idea of government responsibility, that it is hard to know where to begin. But begin the US must, with an independent inquiry that has the powers to demand evidence and reach firm conclusions.

If the many allegations about budget cuts, lack of preparedness and slow and chaotic response are accurate, then work must begin now to protect potential victims of future catastrophic events. Events of the scale of Hurricane Katrina are mercifully rare, but catastrophes are not all that unusual. Regardless of the party affiliation of those responsible for the appalling story of New Orleans, the administration has a clear public duty to ensure such bungling never happens again. George W Bush is not the man to lead that effort.

In Egypt this week, a fire tragically took the lives of 13 young students locked in a theatre. When the bodies were removed to the morgue, armed guards beat back relatives who were desperate for news of their loved ones. As one reporter wrote:

"This was a human calamity, a summer theatre festival for university students that ended with the deaths of 13 young people from one theatre troupe alone, and the government's primary response was to focus on security."

From New Orleans, we hear the same complaint: that the federal government sent more troops than doctors, more guns than medical supplies. And in another curious echo of events in Louisiana, an Egyptian protester identified the cause:

"We're very, very tired," Mr. Izat yelled. "We're very, very poor. They don't care about us."

Who's getting rich from COVID-19?

Boris Johnson's government stands accused of 'COVID cronyism', after handing out staggering sums of money to controversial private firms to fight COVID-19. Often the terms of these deals are kept secret, with no value-for-money checks or penalties for repeated failures which cost lives. And many major contracts have gone directly to key Tory donors and allies – without competition.

As COVID rates across the country surge, how can we hold our leaders accountable? Meet the lawyers, journalists and politicians leading the charge in our free live discussion on Thursday 1 October at 5pm UK time.

Hear from:

Dawn Butler Labour MP for Brent Central and member of the House of Commons Committee on Science and Technology

Peter Geoghegan Investigations editor, openDemocracy, and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Jolyon Maugham Barrister and founder of the Good Law Project.

Peter Smith Procurement expert and author of 'Bad Buying: How Organisations Waste Billions through Failures, Frauds and F*ck-ups'

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief of openDemocracy

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData