Counting the Cost

10 October 2005

After reading Jean Seaton’s recent article for openDemocracy, “The Numbers Game”, I was struck by the prominence of casualty figures littering the headlines about the recent earthquake in Pakistan. The true scale of the tragedy in the country’s northern provinces has been revealed through an overall death toll that has risen steadily – and often shockingly – since the earthquake struck on Saturday 8th October.

It is hard to know how to react to the prominence of such figures. Seaton’s article questions whether death counts should be the most important thing in a story and calls for journalists to move beyond the attention-grabbing tactics of the numbers game. On the one hand she is right. We must continually be wary of an eagerness by news agencies to guesstimate casualty figures in order to be the first to claim a new headline. In these cases the pain and suffering that lies behind the figures can be lost or easily forgotten amidst a battle of numbers.

On the other hand news agencies have a duty to seek out information and continually update reports as more is known, a task made especially difficult in remote areas like Kashmir where accurate information is hard to come by. Also, the prominence of casualty figures in the headlines has, as it did for the Asian Tsunami, alerted the world to the scale of the disaster and prompted large-scale international aid efforts – the other figures making the headlines.

It is perhaps too early to be able to assess the media’s response to the tragedy in Pakistan. Estimates of the scale of the disaster in human fatalities have their time and place and, perhaps, will always be the first news 'stories' from any disaster zone. When more is known we must move beyond such attention-grabbing numbers to more thoughtful assessments of, for example, why so many people lost their lives, how the disaster has affected people in the region and what it could mean for the future of Pakistan.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData