Killing in Sudan

23 February 2005

Last June, openDemocracy published an open letter to world leaders by Gareth Evans of the International Crisis Group, in which he called for the leaders of the G8 richest industrialised countries to act to prevent further deaths in Sudan's eastern region of Darfur.  Two months later, he told openDemocracy that the situation had deteriorated and that action was even more urgent.

A lot of blood has gone under the bridge since then. On the positive side, a peace deal signed early this year that may bring an end to the war in the south Sudan, in which millions have died over the last thirty years.

But today, as if a reminder is needed, Nicolas Kristof and the New York Times publish photographs of dead civilians in Darfur taken by African Union monitors.

Web sites like www.darfurgenocide.org and www.savedarfur.org are trying to galvanize Americans, says Kristof, "but the response has been pathetic".

Someone will correct me if this is wrong, but the situation in Darfur didn't rate a mention in George Bush's speeches in Brussels this week (and if it did, it was pretty low down the agenda).

At one point in an interview with the BBC today, Sudan's ambassador to Britain said that refugees in Darfur had fled to the camps because they preferred being looked after by foreign aid agencies. 

It does get blacker than this, but not often.

Articles on openDemocracy relating to Sudan include:

Accoutantability in Africa: whose problem? by David Mepham
Darfur Journal by Lyndall Stein
America in Africa: plunderer or partner? by Ken Wiwa and Gayle Smith
Who is accountable for Darfur?: an interview with Gareth Evans by Caspar Henderson
Darfur: countdown to catastophe by Stephen Ellis
The United States and international aid: missing the big picture by Anne Richard
Rwanda, Sudan and beyond: lessons from Africa by Caspar Henderson

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData