Home

No Oscar for Constant Gardener

5 March 2006

An exceptionally great movie will not win the Oscar for best film later today or deliver the golden statue to Fernando Meirelles for best director.  In neither category has the The Constant Gardener been nominated. Yet it deserves to be recognised as a defining work of the beginning of the century.

As well as classic thriller ingredients of love, death, loyalty, treason and suspense it shows something else that makes it truly original. I won’t say makes it ‘a work of art’ because that might sound like an appeal to art-house difficulty or pretention which it does not suffer from at all. What is has is the popular greatness of an artistic breakthrough.


There are many films which illuminate the pain of globalisation for people who are in or from developing countries: the turmoil of imposed modernisation, the suffering of odysseys of migration and the vigour of refusal and resistance.  

The Constant Gardener takes this almost as a given. What it shows is globalisation itself: its inner cheap energy and the different servants of its growth.  These include the cynically corrupt politicians of the African country where it takes place (Kenya is the location, talk about being spot on!), the hi-tech advantages of western big-pharma, the degraded opportunism of the United Kingdom’s diplomatic corps, the crude violence of indigenous Africa as well as its dignified capacity for suffering, both of which permit its exploitation. From the weight of railways to the lightness of apple mac video messages, the domination of contemporary corporate interests and the tenacity of resistance to them is shown without untrue sentimentality  - and in a way that lets us experience the forces at work.
 
In this case these forces do not include American imperialism. The Constant Gardener does not celebrate America in any way, either positive or negative. Corporate globalisation always feeds off state power. But today it has no essential national face.  It takes place without, as well as with, the United States, which is no longer necessary to it.  The passion, distance and experience of a British novelist and a Brazilian filmmaker have combined to illuminate our world in a way that puts Hollywood in its place.

Who's getting rich from COVID-19?

Boris Johnson's government stands accused of 'COVID cronyism', after handing out staggering sums of money to controversial private firms to fight COVID-19. Often the terms of these deals are kept secret, with no value-for-money checks or penalties for repeated failures which cost lives. And many major contracts have gone directly to key Tory donors and allies – without competition.

As COVID rates across the country surge, how can we hold our leaders accountable? Meet the lawyers, journalists and politicians leading the charge in our free live discussion on Thursday 1 October at 5pm UK time.

Hear from:

Dawn Butler Labour MP for Brent Central and member of the House of Commons Committee on Science and Technology

Peter Geoghegan Investigations editor, openDemocracy, and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Jolyon Maugham Barrister and founder of the Good Law Project.

Peter Smith Procurement expert and author of 'Bad Buying: How Organisations Waste Billions through Failures, Frauds and F*ck-ups'

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief of openDemocracy

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData