The manifestos - Find the missing word

14 April 2005

What word is missing from all the party political manifestos? What all-shaping, decisive political word, cannot be found in them at all?

No one in the openDemocracy office could guess, not even David Hayes.

It’s the gorilla in the nursery, the elephant in the living room.

It isn’t ‘globalisation’, which the Labour Manifesto mentions – the Tory Manifesto one only manages the more feeble ‘global’ a couple of times. It isn’t the ‘constitution’, which Labour claims to have reshaped.

It isn’t Europe. Alan Cowell of the New York Times launched his intelligent election coverage with a fascinating article on how Europe was a key issue at the last election but has simply been bled out of political debate in today’s Britain - even though it is arguably the most important question facing the United Kingdom.

But while not an ‘issue’ in contention, at least all the party manifestos take a stand on Europe and the EU in suitably pious ways.

No, the word all parties fear is: AMERICA

Our new found land and oldest ally has yet to be discovered so far as the current election campaign is concerned.

All three have international sections on Britain’s role in world affairs. In them Labour’s manifesto twice mentions that “we have worked with the US” (without the ‘A’). This is hardly generous. The Tory document makes no mention of the global leviathan at all. Nor does the Liberal Democrat Manifesto.

But the whole of Blair’s approach to world affairs is built on his belief that Britain has to be as close as possible to the United States of America. It is his foreign policy.

No party dares to be seen as anti-American. All fear the call from the US Embassy that would follow. Nor, now, this is a great change, dare they be seen as pro-American, for British voters do not wish to see their national leaders on their knees before Washington, the only posture that seems acceptable to George Bush. So shifty avoidance and silence follows.

It all adds to the smell of discomfort, shame and humiliation of these election days.

All real name comments welcome, please send them to [email protected]

Who's getting rich from COVID-19?

Boris Johnson's government stands accused of 'COVID cronyism', after handing out staggering sums of money to controversial private firms to fight COVID-19. Often the terms of these deals are kept secret, with no value-for-money checks or penalties for repeated failures which cost lives. And many major contracts have gone directly to key Tory donors and allies – without competition.

As COVID rates across the country surge, how can we hold our leaders accountable? Meet the lawyers, journalists and politicians leading the charge in our free live discussion on Thursday 1 October at 5pm UK time.

Hear from:

Dawn Butler Labour MP for Brent Central and member of the House of Commons Committee on Science and Technology

Peter Geoghegan Investigations editor, openDemocracy, and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Jolyon Maugham Barrister and founder of the Good Law Project.

Peter Smith Procurement expert and author of 'Bad Buying: How Organisations Waste Billions through Failures, Frauds and F*ck-ups'

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief of openDemocracy

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData