Home

Wings of change

8 March 2005

In preparation for openDemocracy's forthcoming debate on the politics of climate change, campaigners and others are already wrestling with the question of what actually works. 

Could some of them take a green leaf out of the UK government's book?   The idea may not be as unlikely as it may seem once  you read this report.

BBC online reports that  Britain will announce a scheme to promote clean energy in developing countries by paying into a fund every time a minister or civil servant takes a trip by air. The idea is to offset the climate change impact of the carbon dioxide emissions from flying.

Many international campaigners are addicted to flying about all over the place too.  Should they follow suit?

A report for a coalition of development NGOs published late last year said that  progress in meeting human development goals for the world's poorest people will go   Up in Smoke unless action to reduce emissions of greenhouse gas emissions is taken soon.

Does that include doing something about one's own emissions?  Andrew Simms, lead author of the report, tells oD that his organisation, the New Economics Foundation, uses the Climate Care site to offset emissions if anyone has to fly. "It's anti poverty and sustainable energy projects rather than tree planting", he says.  Andrew adds that he has also recommended this to the coalition, "who are pursuing at their own speeds".

The Working Group on Climate Change and Development includes: ActionAid International, Christian Aid, Columban Faith and Justice, IDS (Institute of Development Studies), ITDG (Intermediate Technology Development Group), IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development), Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, nef (new economics foundation), Operation Noah, Oxfam, People & Planet, RSPB, Tearfund, teri Europe, WWF, WaterAid and World Vision.

Are these coalition members buying into the idea of paying a little bit extra to marginally mitigate the impact of flying staff around ?  Who are the pioneers?  We'd love to hear.

openDemocracy's debate on the politics of climate change will take place from 20 April to 10 June, ahead of the G8 summit.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData