A new paradigm for the fight against terror

7 April 2005

'One of the most surprising political developments since the attacks of Sept. 11. 2001 has been the extent to which the fight against terrorism has divided the democratic world' writes Fernando Cardoso former president of Brazil in today's International Herald Tribune.

But Cardoso has faith. The 'seemingly unbridgeable gulf' between those who wanted to counter terrorism through 'taking the battle to the enemy' and those who 'tended to minimise the threat' is not so unbridgeable after all. It is the Madrid Agenda, Cardoso believes, that may prove to be our golden gate.

Almost a month has passed since the International Summit on Democracy and Terrorism which took place in Madrid  March 8-11.

So what did it achieve? Certainly we must look at the Summit as more than an event, more than a three-day whirl of activists, academics and politicians. For three months before the Summit, activists spent many long hours researching the various causes of terrorism, how to confront it, and longer term democratic responses, as did a lively public in our online debates. And so the Madrid Agenda emerged.

For Cardoso the Madrid Agenda represents an emerging global consensus on the issue of terrorism whose central elements are:

- to condemn terrorism unequivocally

- to fight it through the rule of law

- to promote international cooperation

- to spread and deepen democracy

Of all of these he points to democracy as key, democracy based on more than just elections but 'a vibrant civil society and full respect for the rights of ethnic and religious minorities.'

As Cardoso writes 'where people have access to institutions to address their most urgent concerns - economic, political or cultural - they have no reason to turn to the merchants of hate and fear.'

Do you agree that the Madrid Agenda represents a real turning point, 'a new paradigm cutting across the ideological divisions that have hindered the fight against terrorism in the past?'

And if democracy is key, how can we best encourage vibrant civil society and responsive institutions?

Join the Madrid debate and comment on the Madrid Agenda here.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData