Skip to content

Anti-strike bill: a step toward forced labour in the UK?

The government seems willing to undermine the very bedrock of human rights law to keep employees at work

Anti-strike bill: a step toward forced labour in the UK?
Outside UCH Hospital in January 2023 | Maggie Sully/Alamy Stock Photo. All rights reserved
Published:

Theresa May, both as home secretary and prime minister, pushed for the UK to become a global leader in the international struggle against contemporary forms of slavery. Her vision was always a blurred one, in which she somehow reconciled championing the 2015 Modern Slavery Act alongside prosecuting victims of human trafficking for the crime of “illegal working”. But at least she articulated an ambition to make the UK something better.

That ambition is long gone. Instead, the UK now has government ministers who revel in their contempt for human rights, including anti-slavery protections. The home secretary, Suella Braverman, has repeatedly and groundlessly asserted that migrants are trying to “game the system” by claiming to have been trafficked. She is doing her best to reframe slavery as an immigration matter, and NGOs fear that the government’s protection responsibilities will be neglected in favour of establishing a hard-faced and xenophobic deportation policy.

This affront to national and international law has attracted criticism from the United States, the United Nations, and even the UK’s Office for Statistics Regulation. In normal times, it would also probably attract censure from the UK’s own anti-slavery commissioner. But that role is currently vacant because Braverman has failed to appoint anyone to it. How fortuitous for her.