Skip to content

Can you ‘see’ slavery? Black skins, brown skins, and the price of in/visibility in colonial India

‘I know it when I see it’ is a problematic guiding principle for anti-slavery activities, yet it has been a feature of abolitionist interventions for nearly 200 years.

Can you ‘see’ slavery? Black skins, brown skins, and the price of in/visibility in colonial India
A duck hunt in Sindh, Pakistan, ca. 1924. | Mike/Flickr. Creative Commons (by-sa)
Published:

Can you ‘see’ slavery? What tells your senses that it is, in fact, slavery that you are observing? Using satellite images, today researchers claim to see modern slavery from the lofty heights of space – to be able to estimate, find, and free individuals from egregious forms of abuse and drudgery. But is it really so simple to “spot the signs”? Has it ever been? Revisiting anti-slavery activities of the nineteenth century suggests it was never a simple task to see slavery, even from up close. Relying on proxies, symbols, and easy correlations – rather than in-depth analysis and context – has always been a feature of anti-slavery activism.

When liberators have selective vision, both being seen as well as not being seeing can be two sides of a double-edged sword.

After the British abolished slavery in India in 1843, colonial agents relied on their sight to determine who was, and who was not, a slave. Decisions made by agents monitoring ports, borders, and other transit hubs were not reached through reason and argument. They were immediate, off-the-cuff judgements – slaves were either “self-evident” or not. If agents saw what they were looking for, the person in question was ‘freed’. If not, masters were allowed to pass with their dependents in tow.