Blair did not invade Iraq

OurKingdom: Breaking News! We have learnt from a well placed source that after a massive international Interpol investigation the authorities have concluded that there is not sufficient evidence to charge Tony Blair with having ordered the invasion of Iraq. Asked how British troops could therefore today be in Iraq, a police official close to the investigation, speaking on condition of anonymity, pointed out that, despite the fact that people who have no right to be in the UK's upper chamber are sitting today in the Lords after lending the Labour Party large sums of money, there is not enough evidence to conclude there is an official relationship between cause and effect. The key problem for both investigations, he continued, is that what is obvious is not considered to be evidence in British law. We understand that it is now likely that an ongoing investigation into the corruption of British public life will conclude that there is now not even sufficient evidence that Tony Blair was actually Prime Minister in the sense of being responsible for anything that happened between 1997 and this year. According to ePolitix "The sticking point has been the admissibility of evidence obtained by the police. The bar has been raised incredibly high because of the sensitivities." Nick Robinson of the BBC claims to have spoken recently to the alleged former Prime Minister who apparently nonetheless feels that the sensitivities were insufficient to shield him from a "witchhunt". It seems the alleged former Prime Minister is confident that a properly conducted investigation under a judge of his choice will conclude that there are indeed witches at work.