Skip to content

How to navigate trade-offs in parliamentary strengthening

Our most innovative programmes have been the product of necessity. This has clear policy implications: donors who want to see innovation must be more tolerant of risk.

Published:
howDoParls-banner@2x.png
howDoParls-banner@2x.png

WFD supported the Coalition of Arab Women MPs' seminar on combatting violence against women. Westminster Foundation.
WFD supported the Coalition of Arab Women MPs' seminar on combatting violence against women. Westminster Foundation.

WFD supported the Coalition of Arab Women MPs' seminar on combatting violence against women. Westminster Foundation.How can we best promote legislative strengthening in new democracies? In a previous article, I talked about a new research project that aims to fill some of the gaps in our knowledge about democracy promotion.

That project aims to do more than say ‘context matters’. We want to know what works where and when, and why it does so. This week we’re taking our first steps in that direction with the release of a new policy paper. Nic Cheeseman and I argue that parliamentary strengthening involves several trade-offs. Democracy promoters can’t avoid them, but they can learn to navigate them more effectively. Our policy paper – built on the experience of the Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD) – provides a framework that helps to do this.