My 350 on Donald Trump: going backwards

We will state in solidarity that if Mr. Trump attempts to build his wall, we the people promise to be on site and do everything in our power to prevent such an event.

Anthony Sayegh
19 November 2016

On 9 November 2016, to the astonishment of many Americans and citizens around the world, Donald Trump was elected the 45th President of the United States; the man who vows to “make America great again” through his (and his apostle’s) abhorrence for undocumented immigrants, and the reversal of our progress towards addressing climate change, among other rhetoric.

The overall disappointment cannot be summed up within any brief statement. But there are universal problems regarding his ambitions that any reasonably thinking individual can observe.

Twenty-seven years ago on 9 November 1989, a nation of patriots, having struggled with the division of its citizens for nearly a half of a century prior, tore down the very infrastructure that symbolized and upheld division rather than unity, the Berlin Wall.

The first 100-day plan of Mr. Trump’s Presidency states what he and his wave of supporters have been calling for all along: a wall along the US southern border dividing us from our neighbor Mexico. In addition, his proposition calls for Mexico to reimburse the US for infrastructural costs.

Here we are, blatantly moving towards history repeating itself. It would be in the utmost dishonor to those who have worked and died for humanity, to allow for such tangible symbolism to occur again. It is here, and now: we will state in solidarity that if Mr. Trump attempts to build his wall, we the people promise to be on site and do everything in our power to prevent such an event.

The very little progress that has been made on behalf of the United States towards climate change, is at risk with a Trump Presidency, combined with a Republican Senate and House majority.

The opposition is called upon to be stronger than ever. We must maintain respectful dialogue at the community level and educate each other on the topic. As the late Christopher Hitchens once said, “Whether global warming is caused by the hand of humans or not, is irrelevant. We should be acting as if it were simply because we have nowhere else to go.”

Live discussion: Why is everyone taking the government to court?

There's a pandemic on – so why are openDemocracy, Foxglove and others challenging the British government's health contracts in court? Join us for the inside story on how we're going to extraordinary lengths to force the government to reveal what they're doing with public money and citizens' health records.

Join us for this free event on 4 March at 5pm UK time/12pm EST.

Hear from:

Cori Crider Lawyer Investigator and co-founder of Foxglove, a non-profit that seeks to make the use of technology fair for everyone

Caroline Molloy Editor ourNHS and openDemocracyUK

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief, openDemocracy

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData