openDemocracyUK: Opinion

We must build the institutions of solidarity

And a new common sense.

Peter McColl
14 December 2019
Madragon university - part of the world's biggest co-op

I had a brief conversation with a fellow voter at the polling station. I spoke to an old friend in the supermarket, who was buying items for the school foodbank with her children.

In both conversations, I could sense that we both wanted to hope and to tell one another that there was still hope. We yearned to hope for an end to the brutal attacks on the vulnerable, an end to the hideous logic of a government committed to winning by undermining reality, an end to the nightmare of the last 10 years.

I wrote something I didn't share about that hope.

Then I watched the announcement of the exit poll, and all that hope drained away. This could be a very long 5 years.

It's incredibly hard. I feel totally empty. A deep sense that we couldn't convince people that hope was better than hate. And I expect many of you will feel like that too.

We need to look after ourselves, but we also need to be prepared for what is coming.

Brexit will be used to gear up the austerity playbook. Public services will be run down, privatised, removed altogether. More people will die so that the few can increase their already substantial wealth.

And that process will start almost immediately. The electorate, whether voters meant it or not, has given a massive endorsement to this attack on public services and the vulnerable.

So we need to understand quickly how to get back on the front foot. That means understanding what people wanted from Brexit. I read a lot of focus group transcripts. Many of those show that people think that Brexit will deliver both substantial increases in spending, and a reduction on the pressure on public services.

This is obviously untrue. We need to find a way to communicate these failures in ways that build solidarity, and most importantly, bring people with us.

When the end to austerity doesn't materialise the Tories will blame immigrants, minorities, Travelling communities, anyone but themselves. We need to stand with those under fire. We need to build a different 'common sense'.

For now that has to be based in communities, building our own ways to communicate beyond a media that will always be hostile to our aims, and creating a popular demand for change that can transform electoral politics when we next get the chance. All those tabloid headlines about how immigrants were to blame for all social evils created the political weather. We need to find a way to change the political climate. Since the union movement went into decline, we have failed to do that. The best time to have started this was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

As it becomes clear that Brexit won't 'be done' any time soon we have an opportunity to make this case.

There are other vital issues we need to build movements for change around. The most important is the climate. After the defeat of the Spanish republic in the 1930s, radicals in Spain found ways to organise outside the political system. They build massive workers' cooperatives. They lived solidarity. We need to find the ways to do those things on climate – while building political demands.

We need to argue that the reason peoples' lives aren't satisfying is because of the system. We can't do that while trying to play the system. The biggest failure of the Labour campaign was that it focused on (really good) policies to transform the way the system worked. We need to replace the system. And we need to make the way that change will work obvious – it needs to form a new 'common sense'.

We need to give people power back in their everyday lives, in the workplace, in their community, in their schools. We need to stop using centralisation as a proxy for solidarity.

So, to adapt an old saying, don't just mourn, get angry. And let's share those ideas of how we can create a new system. One that isn't prone to mass misinformation, to visiting ruthless punishment on the vulnerable for the actions of the powerful and that destroys our planet for profit.

We've found the limits of playing by the rules. And we lose. We need to change those rules. And we need to work out how we build a coalition in society to create those new rules.

US election: what's going on in Trump's must-win states?

Our editor-in-chief, Mary Fitzgerald, is on the ground in key US battleground states – follow her on Twitter @maryftz for live updates.

There's never been more at stake. But the pandemic has kept many foreign journalists away. Hundreds of international observers who normally oversee US elections aren't there.

Can we trust the polls? What's the blanket media coverage not telling us? Hear Mary describe what she's seeing and hearing across the country, from regular citizens to social justice activists to right-wing militias arming themselves for election day.

Plus: get the inside scoop on openDemocracy's big 'follow-the-money' investigation – just broken – which lifts the lid on how Trump-linked groups are going global with their culture wars.

Join us for a free live discussion on Thursday 29 October, 5pm UK time/1pm EDT.

Hear from:

Remi Bak Policy officer, European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights

David Corn Washington DC bureau chief of Mother Jones, MSNBC analyst and co-author the New York Times no. 1 bestselling book ‘Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump’

Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief, openDemocracy

Lydia Namubiru Africa editor, openDemocracy

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData