Home

What are we really doing here?

26 January 2006
  At the World Social Forum Presentation yesterday, organizers of the Caracas, Mali, Mumbai, Nairobi, and Brazil Social Forums met in a panel discussion to talk about the direction that the World Social Forum should advocate.  While the talk did occasionally veer into substantive issues, the meat of the discussion boiled down to advocacy and whether it was the place of a forum that promotes open dialogue to advocate on behalf on certain political issues.  [Although it should be noted that there was a large poster that read "Bush iAsesino! (killer)" with a rather inflammatory picture of Bush sporting a Hitler style Mustache].
A highlight of the talk was Jacobo Torres de Leon (organizer of the Caracas WSF) assertion that the Forum could maintain its autonomy from government, despite the belief that Chavez was running the show.  He spoke of the importance of autonomy in maintaining a free discourse at the forum but felt the need to qualify that statement by saying that he personally advocated the Chavez government and that the forum could only happen in South America with the help of leaders like him.  While it is a valid assertion of one's personal beliefs, it seemed inappropriate to the procedural purpose of the panel discussion. The panel never fully resolved the issue, but it could be that the forum is what the participants make of it.  Formal goals and procedures are often the downfall of open discourse.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData