Under the extreme pressure of the Russian invasion, the Ukrainian government has pursued a policy of reducing state influence in various sectors of the economy – rather than using the state’s powers to harness the country’s resources in service of the war effort against Russia – according to a recent report by Luke Cooper at the LSE.
But participants were also optimistic about the chance for a fair and inclusive reconstruction that met Ukrainian society’s need for economic stability and growth – a chance guaranteed by including more local government officials, civil society, workers’ and women’s groups, in the recovery process.
“The outcome of progressive causes in Ukraine is crucial to the future democratic make-up of Ukraine. And those discussions have to begin now,” said Taras Fedirko, lecturer at the University of Glasgow.
Anthony Barnett, writer and founder of openDemocracy, called for a peace that eventually involves dialogue between Ukrainian, Belarusian and Russian societies. The global crisis caused by Russia’s invasion, he told the conference, was an extreme challenge, but also an opportunity for democratic renewal.
“We're now in an era when the politics of neoliberalism has failed,” he said. “This told us it was pointless hoping anything could be any different, and the ‘market knew best’.
“In a way Putin’s invasion of Ukraine seeks to impose a similar, related fatalism. But his invasion is failing too – and so a striking, fresh, honest conversation about how we defend and create democracy is beginning.”
That conversation, however, must also deal with the lack of action the West – including progressive circles – took over Russian aggression against Ukraine in the first stage of the war in 2014, writer Olesya Khromeychuk told the conference.
“We must confront the lack of response from the western left in 2014 over Donbas and Crimea,” she said.
Comments
We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.