Teaching schoolchildren in east London to discover their political voice

Two history teachers took their 12-year-old school students through a journey of discovering the history of Britain’s voting rights, and what theirs look like today.

Florence Pennant Rosie Goodhart
27 February 2017

One of the dangers of the modern world is that people become too fixated on the now, and on their own stories, condemned to live in the present and not understanding what their current social reality has emerged from. With this in mind, at our school in east London where we teach history, we began to explore the development of democracy from the Great Reform Act of 1832 to the Equal Franchise Act of 1928, with our Year 8 (12-year-old) students.

Keen to skirt away from oversimplification or history as anecdote – the Chartists were a group of men who in the end failed to achieve anything, the Suffragettes were violent and Emily Davison threw herself under a horse – keener still to ensure students saw that all important link between the past and present, we settled on an overarching enquiry question:


Our students spent a month looking in-depth at either the Chartists or the Suffrage movement. They wrote narrative accounts of individuals or events from 1832 to 1928 that helped to shape our voting rights, and divided them into two structures: the ‘story then’ and then the ‘story now.’

Screen Shot 2017-02-23 at 15.42.30_0.png

Alongside this, they prepared for a protest march to Newham Town Hall. Equipped with their leaflets, they talked to the people of Newham about why the voices of those who helped shape our democracy are still relevant today.

Here are a few of our students’ slogans and thoughts, produced along the way:

Screen Shot 2017-02-23 at 15.33.19.png
Screen Shot 2017-02-23 at 15.33.52.png
Screen Shot 2017-02-23 at 15.34.20.png
Screen Shot 2017-02-23 at 15.34.52.png

Did the ‘story now’ help to make the link? Do they better understand what it means to have a political voice? We hope so. Though who knows whether it will stay with them.

openDemocracy is partnering with the World Forum for Democracy, exploring the relationship between education and democracy. Read more here.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData