In Syria, mixing violent and nonviolent resistance jeopardized people power, particularly when violence became the main driver of resistance from early 2012 onward. See Part Two.
Aunque se pospuso, EE. UU. aún amenaza con un ataque para sancionar al gobierno de Assad por el uso de armas químicas. Sin embargo, el ataque sería ilegítimo, ilegal e ineficaz; y no ayudaría ni al pueblo sirio, ni a los principios de la responsabilidad de proteger (Responsibility to Protect, R2P)
La doctrina de la responsabilidad de proteger (Responsibility to Protect, R2P) no ha logrado crear un consenso internacional sobre las acciones para proteger a la población civil de Siria. Peor aún, el apoyo implícito de la R2P a la acción militar sin autorización de la ONU ha contribuido a la par
Twenty years in twenty photographs. See the introduction here in part 1.
Are there any Israelis and Palestinians who still believe in peace between them? Yes, there are, but they are implementing a different “process”. The following stories are of coexistence.
Has ‘multilevel governance’ replaced the nation state or European confederation, creating the precondition for a multilevel citizenship? Or is this just a name we give to the empty place left by the demise of the nation state?
No money or goods exchanged, just take what you want.
Sovereignty matters, but so does preventing mass atrocity. A doctrine like the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) permits us to override inertia and inaction to alleviate mass suffering, although in Syria we haven’t yet seen an effective plan for doing so. A response to the openGlobalRights debate on
“人權的概念由誰定義？”Stephen Hopgood 問到。一個植基於以歐洲主義為中心基礎上的新北﹣南對話，可能帶來契機，藉此重新找回人權傳統裡的解放潛能。
