Skip to content

Gosh, Dubya Don’t Know!

Published:

Operation Doomsday Scenario

“When I say something, I mean it.”

It’s darn hard to resist opening with a Dubya quote. This gem appeared in his latest stage-managed prime-time press conference (his third in three-and-a-half years of presidency). The Prez outlined how determined he was to present the spiralling situation in Iraq as a foreign policy success. “Gosh, I don’t know,” he said when asked if he’d not been clear with the American people. “I’m sure something will pop into my head here,” he falsely predicted when asked to cite the single biggest mistake of his presidency. Senator Elizabeth Dole (Rep. N.C.) gushed how Bush’s performance “showed he was a leader in every sense of the word” – whatever that might mean.

Still, if Dubya really does say something and mean it, at least that marks him out from the Diary’s primary news source: KCNA, the official North Korean foghorn.

When North Korea says something they mean, they don’t mean it. At least, not unless they do, which is never.

This week, as all eyes were fixed on Falluja - except Bush’s, which were fixed on his answer sheet, from which he read monotonally sentence-by-sentence – Abdul Qadeer Khan, “father” of Pakistan’s bomb and international black market spiv, told his interrogators he’d personally seen three North Korean nuclear devices (read: weapons) during a 1999 sales trip to the People’s Democratic Republic. The report first appeared in the New York Times.

Why does this matter? Well, leaving aside the prospect of Armageddon for the moment, if Khan is telling the truth, he’s the first non-North Korean to have seen evidence of the rogue state’s nuclear capabilities.

Time to stock up on duct tape?

The White House refused to comment on the issue, saying it was “too sensitive” (kind of like the Diary), though the Washington Post quoted a White House official as saying “The details are a little hazy” – hey, this is North Korea! Cheney’s people were not so mealy mouthed. “Time is not necessarily on our side,” a ‘senior official’ admitted. “We think it’s important to move forward aggressively.”

Gosh, that’s a new tactic!

Cheney is currently on a tour of the Far East, taking in China, South Korea and lots of noodles (Cheney first visited China in 1975, with President Gerald Ford – this guy’s been around a while). On Sino-US relations, Cheney said “it would be a mistake for us to underestimate the extent of the differences” between the two countries. “I did not come here expecting to alter Chinese policy,” he said, to the surprise of everyone.

The Cheney team said talks between North Korea and its foes must start to show “real results” soon. The question now is whether Khan, if he means what he’s saying, knows what he’s talking about. The guy’s smart, but can he tell a real bomb from a mock-up? Can he be sure of what he saw? Was he wearing the right glasses? Etcetera.

Khan has claimed to have provided a “shopping list” of nuclear equipment to North Korea. “We think they’ve pretty much bought everything on the list,” one US official told the New York Times.

Whatever the facts, the Diary wants to propose an alternative theory. Bearing in mind a) President Bush’s policy reversal on West Bank settlements this week (he’s letting Sharon keep some and no longer demanding Israel respect the pre-1967 borders in any peace deal), a move which will no doubt inflame the Arab world; b) the militarisation of the situation in Iraq as an occupation policy; c) the rather odd way Washington chose to stay “aggressive” with Pyongyang even when they were waging war in Iraq and, frankly, did not have the time or resources to fight another war, could it be that Mssrs. Cheney and Rumsfeld are actually trying to get rid of their boss?

Far-fetched? Don’t blame the Diary. Last month the Atlantic Monthly ran a piece by James Mann detailing how in the 1980s Cheney and Rummy would slip out of bed in the middle of the night, relocate to various air force bases, and hatch plans of how to bypass the legal rules for presidential succession in the event of a nuclear strike. If the Prez got zapped, Cheney and Rummy would ditch the Constitution, sideline the Senate and Congress, and install their own “President” for reasons of “stability” and “continuity”.

Hmm…

War on terror-drugs

The Spanish authorities investigation into the 11 March terror bombings revealed some startling information this week, as accounted for by Interior Minister Angel Acebes.

It turns out the Islamic extremists, who blew themselves up last week, were not funded by Osama bin Laden (he who offered a truce with Europe this week), but by the sale of hashish and Ecstasy.

That’s right, in the tradition of Mohammed Atta & co. and their favourite Floridian strip clubs, this bunch of religious puritans somehow found it in their souls to peddle narcotics. The proceeds paid for the explosives that blew apart women, children and commuters on 11 March.

In order to atone for their sins (so to speak), the terrorists would participate in regular purification acts, ingesting holy water from Mecca.

The leader of the terror group was Jamal Zougam, owner of a cellphone store. The drug pusher was Jamal Ahmidan, a 30-year-old whose family owns a string of wholesale clothing stores in Madrid (El Pais). The spiritual leader was 37-year-old Sarhane ben Abdelmahid Faket, an former economics student married to a 17-year-old Moroccan woman. (New York Times)

The group is believed to be responsible for planting the explosive device that was diffused on the high-speed rail link between Madrid and Seville. It also planned to target Jewish sites in the coming months.

Meanwhile, a senior French counter-terrorism official told the Financial Times this week that “We have underestimated the terrorists’ willingness and capacity to develop chemical weapons.” Across Europe, small groups of chemical experts are popping up. “The thing that is most clear is that the people with the knowledge of chemicals are very organised.”

Training in chemical warfare is believed to have been conducted by the notorious Abu Musab al-Zarkawi in Heart, Afghanistan between 2000-01, and also in Chechnya.

Take note, Mr. Putin.

Selective memory

Meanwhile, the ongoing investigation of the US commission on terrorism into the 9/11 attacks continued to deliver defining moments this week. The highlight was the testimony of National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice.

But while the committee further uncovered the specific nature of pre-9/11 intelligence warnings, the failure of the administration to act (Rice told the panel there was “no silver bullet that could have prevented the Sept. 11 attacks” and described an 6 August 2001 classified briefing warning of an al-Qaida plan to hijack planes as “historical information”), and the long-held plans for an invasion of Iraq, there has also been an uproar of another kind.

In her testimony, Rice mentioned a pattern of pre-9/11 terrorism designed “to spread devastation and chaos and to murder innocent Americans” including “the attack on the marine barracks in Lebanon 1983; the hijacking of the Achille Lauro in 1985; the rise of al-Qaida and the bombings of the World Trade Center in 1993; the attacks on American installations in Saudi Arabia in 1995 and 1996; the East Africa embassy bombings of 1998; the attack on the USS Cole in 2000.”

Er, something missing in that list? Oh yeah, the 1988 Lockerbie bombing, the largest terrorist attack on US citizens before 9/11. Does Rice just have a bad memory a la her boss? Doubt it. More like the bombing was eliminated from her speech as a gift to Libya for having opened up its WMD programme to the dismantling spanners of the international community. Indeed, Libya was only mentioned once in Rice’s testimony – as an example to the world of how rogue states should behave.

Families of the victims of the Lockerbie atrocity are disgusted. “It’s bad enough when you lose a child, and then to have this happen…” said Dan Cohen who lost his 20-year-old daughter. Stephanie Bernstein, who lost her husband, blamed the Bush administration of bowing to business interests, eager to get their hands on Libya’s super-lucrative oil fields. “This shows that they are willing to let Gaddafi buy his way out of jail,” she said. “The energy interests have really triumphed.”

(Source: Reuters)

Stuffing Turkey

Finally, the secretary-general of France’s Union for a Popular Movement (surely one of the worst political monikers in the history of democracy) said this week that Turkey can stuff it over membership of the EU.

“We very clearly say no to Turkey’s integration into the European Union,” said Francois Baroin.

Bulgaria and Romania, OK. Turkey … er, isn’t that in the Middle East?

Foreign Minister Michel Barnier joined the basting, telling the French parliament that Turkey ain’t ready for EU membership.

German foreign minister Joschka Fischer said this week that if the EU wants to be an exclusively Christian club (as Giscard D’Estaing would have it) it should “say so and accept the consequences.”

The latest display of French opposition to Turkish ambition triggered anger in Turkey and a fall in its markets.

“The cock has crowed too soon,” read the headline in the newspaper Aksam.

There’s no need to get personal.

Quotes of the week

“Some of the debate really centres around the fact that people don’t believe that Iraq can be free, that if you’re Muslim or perhaps brown skinned, you can’t be self-governing and free.”
President George W. Bush

“Home base for George Bush, as we saw to the nth degree in the press conference, is terror. Ask him a question, he’s going to terror.”
Senator John Kerry, accusing President Bush, his rival for the Presidency, of using terror for political gain.

“We made mistakes.”
George Tenet, Director of the CIA, in testimony to the 9/11 commission.

“More an ‘oddball’ than a real terrorist threat.”
The CIA’s description of European security services’ attitude towards Osama bin Laden as exposed in a report this week.

“If it’s all about diplomatic process, you’re looking at the end of the diplomatic process.”
US Lieutenant Don Bergin in Falluja.

Contact the Diary: Dominic.Hilton@openDemocracy.net

openDemocracy Author

Dominic Hilton

Dominic Hilton was a commissioning editor, columnist and diarist for openDemocracy from 2001-05.

All articles
Tags:

More from Dominic Hilton

See all

The Battle of Auchterarder

/

Undemocratic reform

/