Neither the CRG nor the Recovery Alliance appear to have a website, although the CRG has published videos about lockdown on social media.
However, it has been claimed that the Recovery Alliance is an umbrella organisation that brings together lockdown-sceptic MPs with the UsforThem campaign group. Reports say that both groups are being advised by Westminster lobbyist Ed Barker, a former parliamentary candidate for the Conservative Party.
UsForThem has raised thousands of pounds through crowdfunding and called for schools to reopen earlier. It is now campaigning against giving COVID vaccines to children – claiming there are “unknown harms” and that “novel vaccines fast-tracked to market have in the past caused devastating harm”.
The Recovery Alliance has also been linked to a campaign group called Believe In Vaccines, which called on the government to use the vaccine rollout to guarantee “permanent immunity from Covid-related lockdowns and restrictions”.
As well as benefiting from the unregistered Recovery Alliance, the Conservative CRG has received several other donations, made via Baker. In total, they amount to almost £30,000.
The register of MPs’ financial interests shows that this includes a £4,500 donation from a private equity firm called Risk Capital Partners LLP.
The business was co-founded by Luke Johnson, the former chair of Patisserie Valerie, who previously admitted he considered fleeing the country after the café chain uncovered what it called “potentially fraudulent” accounting irregularities. Five people were arrested and questioned in relation to the allegations in 2019.
The CRG has also received £15,000 from Matthew Ferrey, a former senior partner at oil company Vitol, who has donated hundreds of thousands of pounds to the Conservative Party.
‘Giant hole in the sieve’
The Electoral Reform Society has previously warned about unincorporated associations “potentially masking many separate donations through a single entity”, and pointed out that they have “few legal reporting requirements”.
Jess Garland, director of policy and research at the Electoral Reform Society, told openDemocracy: “Unincorporated associations are another giant hole in the sieve that is Britain’s party funding rules, letting ‘dark money’ flood into our political system.
“There is a glaring lack of transparency that only fosters distrust and – often justified – fears over who is secretly steering our political debate.
“Voters have a right to know who is influencing our politics. It’s time for transparency and openness, to fix the rot and restore faith in politics.”
Steve Goodrich, head of research and investigations at Transparency International UK, also criticised the role of unincorporated associations in political donations, saying there are “too many dark corners for donors to hide”.
“It is far too easy to evade the rules on donor disclosure through the use of murky unincorporated associations. Despite reforms a decade ago, it is still nearly impossible to learn who is really making political contributions through these secretive clubs.
“To bring dark money out of the shadows we should have greater sight of all political donations worth over £500.”
openDemocracy has contacted Baker for comment.
Comments
We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.