Protest: a matter of human rights

This week sees the second wave of content for our partnership project with human rights organisations CELS and INCLO, with support from the ACLU, looking at why protest is fundamental for human rights and democratic society, and what can be done to protect the right to protest.

2 October 2017

The Right to Protest


A partnership project examining the power of protest

This week, 4–8 December 2017, we are publishing our second wave of content for our Right to Protest partnership project. Every day this week we’ll be publishing new content as part of the project. 

Today, Lesley J. Wood looks at the increasing militarisation of protest policing in North America; researchers from Dejusticia in Colombia look at how the right to protest was a fundamental element of the 2017 Colombia Peace Agreement, but that this and other sections of the Agreement are still to be implemented; while our video interview with Vera Jarach, one of the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo, highlights the mothers search for memory, truth and justice in Argentina. 

Public mobilisations, social protest and human rights are intertwined. Firstly because people generally take to the streets to reject state violence and protest against violations of their rights: to land, to food, to work, to housing, to religious freedom, and so on. Secondly, the act of protest itself entails exercising rights, such as to freedom of expression and the rights of assembly, petition and dissent. Democracies are enriched by protests because of their expressive nature, but also their deliberative and confrontational tone.

A third and final reason is because state intervention in public mobilisations often ends up violating the rights to integrity, health and – in the most extreme cases – to life. Demonstrators also risk their liberty since they may be arbitrarily detained or subject to criminal proceedings for behavior directly related to protesting. The extent to which governments threaten – or protect – the rights of demonstrators reveals the democratic or authoritarian nature of state response.

The aims of the project

Given these factors, social protests are a privileged scenario for the intervention of national human rights organisations. CELS (Center for Legal and Social Studies) and INCLO (International Network of Civil Liberties Organizations) have engaged in this editorial partnership with openDemocracy – with support from the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) – to forge a common space for exploring the many links between human rights and social protest, with expert, academic and activist contributors.

Our aim is to bring together voices that don’t often interact, either because they belong to different fields of work or intervention, or due to geographical distances and/or the segmentation of debates in the global north and south. Or simply because the ideas are not translated into other languages.

For all these reasons, we hope the partnership will serve as a shared platform to present and exchange ideas among a heterogeneous group of actors from different parts of the world. The six-month project will address topics arising in the Americas and other regions, including the use of crowd control weapons, the Black Lives Matter movement, protests by women and students, rural conflicts, and the impact of digital surveillance.


Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData