My 350 on BREXIT: Brexit is a war message

BREXIT means YES for jumping into uncertainty just to show “who has the control”.

Viktoria Kaposi
5 July 2016

My first reflection is that Brexit is a war message to the EU. It means NO for cooperation, NO for negotiations, NO for understanding and accepting the political wishes of the EU for peace and solidarity, it means NO for European values, namely it is a big NO for solidarity and a big “NO money” for those who are in the biggest need.

Brexit is a war message to England, too. It means YES for xenophobia and racism, YES for chaos and anarchism, YES for old-fashioned one-nation myth, YES for deepening the split in society, YES for fear and blaming others, YES for not taking responsibility, YES for risking the future, YES for fighting for power, YES for jumping into uncertainty just to show “who has the control”.

What should be done and by whom? The EU should make efforts to come out of this situation in the most positive way. Which means to tighten relations within the EU, and keep within the EU as large parts of GB as possible, first of all those who voted for remaining.

Further: The European Union needs a better “media strategy” both for adults and for children and students. There is a need for funny facebook-sites about events and results and news, there is a need for a EU-TV channel payed for by and led by the EU, spreading news and fun, being attractive for the most people possible, sharing creativity and cooperative work ideas.

Further: There should be a proactive strategy to win over the Eurosceptics. All EU-members should agree about a common education policy which contains a universal teaching material about the EU from elementary school throughout secondary and university level.

In the aftermath of the historic British vote to leave the EU, openDemocracy is asking for our readers' thoughts on Brexit and what needs to happen next in 350 words. We've had an extraordinary response and you can read them all here.

Who's getting rich from COVID-19?

Boris Johnson's government stands accused of 'COVID cronyism', after handing out staggering sums of money to controversial private firms to fight COVID-19. Often the terms of these deals are kept secret, with no value-for-money checks or penalties for repeated failures which cost lives. And many major contracts have gone directly to key Tory donors and allies – without competition.

As COVID rates across the country surge, how can we hold our leaders accountable? Meet the lawyers, journalists and politicians leading the charge in our free live discussion on Thursday 1 October at 5pm UK time.

Hear from:

Dawn Butler Labour MP for Brent Central and member of the House of Commons Committee on Science and Technology

Peter Geoghegan Investigations editor, openDemocracy, and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Jolyon Maugham Barrister and founder of the Good Law Project.

Peter Smith Procurement expert and author of 'Bad Buying: How Organisations Waste Billions through Failures, Frauds and F*ck-ups'

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief of openDemocracy

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData