My 350 on BREXIT: Brexit is a war message

BREXIT means YES for jumping into uncertainty just to show “who has the control”.

Viktoria Kaposi
5 July 2016

My first reflection is that Brexit is a war message to the EU. It means NO for cooperation, NO for negotiations, NO for understanding and accepting the political wishes of the EU for peace and solidarity, it means NO for European values, namely it is a big NO for solidarity and a big “NO money” for those who are in the biggest need.

Brexit is a war message to England, too. It means YES for xenophobia and racism, YES for chaos and anarchism, YES for old-fashioned one-nation myth, YES for deepening the split in society, YES for fear and blaming others, YES for not taking responsibility, YES for risking the future, YES for fighting for power, YES for jumping into uncertainty just to show “who has the control”.

What should be done and by whom? The EU should make efforts to come out of this situation in the most positive way. Which means to tighten relations within the EU, and keep within the EU as large parts of GB as possible, first of all those who voted for remaining.

Further: The European Union needs a better “media strategy” both for adults and for children and students. There is a need for funny facebook-sites about events and results and news, there is a need for a EU-TV channel payed for by and led by the EU, spreading news and fun, being attractive for the most people possible, sharing creativity and cooperative work ideas.

Further: There should be a proactive strategy to win over the Eurosceptics. All EU-members should agree about a common education policy which contains a universal teaching material about the EU from elementary school throughout secondary and university level.

In the aftermath of the historic British vote to leave the EU, openDemocracy is asking for our readers' thoughts on Brexit and what needs to happen next in 350 words. We've had an extraordinary response and you can read them all here.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData