Home

My 350 on BREXIT: Britain out, long live Europe?

“Focusing too heavily on the « national identity » model has hindered European leaders from finding alternative ways for constructing a sense of community that has respect for Europe’s growing diversity.”

Isabel Ruck
30 June 2016

In the aftermath of the historic British vote to leave the EU, openDemocracy is asking for our readers' thoughts on Brexit and what needs to happen next in 350 words. We've had an extraordinary response and you can read them all here.

Recent events reveal quite blatantly that Europe is struggling with a deep identity crisis, of which Brexit constitutes, according to me, just a symptom. The « democratic deficit - talk » is a less convincing argument, since many member states, including Britain itself (just recall the unelected House of Lords !), are in many regards less democratic than the European Union’s institutions. I therefore believe that we are dealing with an identity crisis.

If such is the case, it is not helpful to simply continue to treat only the symptoms, while perfectly ignoring their common cause. One never heals from cancer just by treating a single metastasis. Yet, the problem that Europe is facing with regard to its identity is that they have never been able to agree on the content of it. Focusing too heavily on the « national identity » model has hindered European leaders from finding alternative ways for constructing a sense of community that has respect for Europe’s growing diversity. Instead we have desperately tried to forge a « Schmittian holy grail » through symbols like the European flag and the European anthem … but Europe had now to learn the hard way, that there was no European Bastille Day that unconditionally federates all societies.

The traditional way of nation-building by inventing a common past has pushed Europe to the brink of an implosion. Paradoxically it seems that the past is a much more divisive factor for forging a European demos than it is a federative one, for the glorified past is necessarily situated in a national context, one that all rising populisms à la Nigel Farage, Marine Le Pen, Geert Wilders and Norbert Hofer try to exploit.

It appears to me a pressing necessity that European politicians work towards a new vision of the European community. It is only when we accept to lessen our organic ideal of community and replace it by a procedural one, through the sacralisation of shared political processes, that Europe can indeed move from a « community in itself » to a « community for itself », that is an ensemble that has developed a binding group consciousness.

Only if a married couple is able to conceive of itself with shared interests in building a common future that requires a constant effort with regard to the possible ups and downs, is their marriage eventually going to last. With my kindest thoughts to all the Brits, who didn't want to pay the high price of this divorce but are now forced to… 

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData