Home

My 350 on BREXIT: Respect and regard for the different nations and regions in the UK.

"The irony of the BREXIT referendum result is that it may well move the UK towards a federal Britain based on clear principles of mutual accountability and shared decision-making."

Michael Hammer
29 June 2016

In the aftermath of the historic British vote to leave the EU, openDemocracy is asking for our readers' thoughts on Brexit and what needs to happen next in 350 words. We've had an extraordinary response and you can read them all here.

The irony of the BREXIT referendum result is that it may well move the UK towards a model which many in the BREXIT campaign would argue they fundamentally reject – a federal Britain based on clear principles of mutual accountability and shared decision-making.

The Scottish Government is actively looking at ways to protect Scotland’s interests as a continuing EU member, and also Northern Ireland has voted on aggregate to Remain in the EU. This has fully exposed how broken the myth of a unitary state which can be governed effectively by a central Parliament has been for some time. Unless Scotland leaves rapidly in spirit and then soon after in law (or to prevent this happening), the UK’s constitutional settlement needs radical reform. Otherwise England may find itself alone in a leaking boat. This is not what people would have voted for, nor would it provide better futures for anyone.

Westminster has lost the legitimacy to govern the whole of the UK without displaying much more respect and regard for the different nations and regions in the UK. This is a collective failure of all major parties and their leadership. To retain a certain level of political, social and cultural unity, should people across the current UK still consider this to be a common good, several important changes are needed:

1.    Westminster needs to genuinely and irrevocably cede key powers to nations and regions in the UK, powers that matter to people in their daily lives and their ability to shape their own future;

2.    Majority politicians need to work to principles of addressing important questions about a joint future on the basis of a respect of regional, generational and minority difference of interests, settings, and identity;

3.    The mutual principles of accountability in a new constitutional settlement need to be set out in written form, and in simple and broadly intelligible ways so that they can serve as a basis of citizens challenging those in power.

Who's getting rich from COVID-19?

Boris Johnson's government stands accused of 'COVID cronyism', after handing out staggering sums of money to controversial private firms to fight COVID-19. Often the terms of these deals are kept secret, with no value-for-money checks or penalties for repeated failures which cost lives. And many major contracts have gone directly to key Tory donors and allies – without competition.

As COVID rates across the country surge, how can we hold our leaders accountable? Meet the lawyers, journalists and politicians leading the charge in our free live discussion on Thursday 1 October at 5pm UK time.

Hear from:

Dawn Butler Labour MP for Brent Central and member of the House of Commons Committee on Science and Technology

Peter Geoghegan Investigations editor, openDemocracy, and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Jolyon Maugham Barrister and founder of the Good Law Project.

Peter Smith Procurement expert and author of 'Bad Buying: How Organisations Waste Billions through Failures, Frauds and F*ck-ups'

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief of openDemocracy

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData