My 350 on BREXIT: The trouble with sovereignty

“Brexiteers’ sovereignty tapped into the colonial nostalgia and delusion of grandeur that is still part of its national consciousness.”

Francesca E.S. Montemaggi
5 July 2016

The more ‘respectable’ members of the public sought to justify their antipathy for the EU by arguing for a Hobbesian notion of sovereignty, which coincides with government rather than wider democratic structures. In the globalised and interconnected world of the twenty first century, the EU is a democratic attempt at dealing with international challenges, such as environmental protection, people and capital mobility, and multinationals dodging taxes and cutting workers’ rights by pitting one state against the other.

The EU is only as good as the efforts made by its members and elected representatives in making it work. A more democratic EU requires national leaders to relinquish some power to ensure that the representatives of European citizens have more influence. Instead of building consensus, the UK demanded a special status.

The independence celebrated by Brexiteers is nothing but a futile search for dominance over others, rather than cooperating with others and sharing responsibility for this shared world. The belief that a country, any country, is independent and can have a mere transactional relationship with others with few or no obligations is fanciful at best.

No country, and indeed no human being, is independent. We are interdependent. Sometimes this means cooperation and friendship and sometimes it is exploitation and dominance. It is up to us to ensure that our relationships are not exploitative.

Brexiteers’ sovereignty tapped into the colonial nostalgia and delusion of grandeur that is still part of its national consciousness. What with America speaking English, the British public has never really been confronted with the loss of empire and a thorough critique of it. Colonial Britishness had precise racial hierarchies that echo in the racist immigration policies of Commonwealth countries, such as Canada and Australia. It is no wonder that people are now telling British ethnic minorities to ‘leave the country’. Sovereignty is just the other side of the coin of xenophobic nationalism.

In the aftermath of the historic British vote to leave the EU, openDemocracy is asking for our readers' thoughts on Brexit and what needs to happen next in 350 words. We've had an extraordinary response and you can read them all here.

How can Americans fight dark money and disinformation?

Violence, corruption and cynicism threaten America's flagging democracy. Joe Biden has promised to revive it – but can his new administration stem the flow of online disinformation and shady political financing that has eroded the trust of many US voters?

Hear from leading global experts and commentators on what the new president and Congress must do to stem the flood of dark money and misinformation that is warping politics around the world.

Join us on Thursday 21 January, 5pm UK time/12pm EST.

Hear from:

Emily Bell Leonard Tow Professor of Journalism and director, Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School

Anoa Changa Journalist focusing on electoral justice, social movements and culture

Peter Geoghegan openDemocracy investigations editor and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance at the Alliance for Securing Democracy

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief, openDemocracy 

Further speakers to be announced

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData