ourNHS

Will Hunt stop at nothing to cut Lewisham Hospital?

Hunt lodged an eleventh hour appeal against the Lewisham Hospital verdict last night. He is determined not just to close Lewisham hospital services but to have carte blanche to do the same elsewhere.

Ruby Waterworth
22 August 2013

 

Last night Jeremy Hunt lodged an eleventh hour appeal against the High Court judgement that quashed his plans to downgrade services at Lewisham Hospital.

 In a disappointing move, the Secretary of State will attempt to overturn Justice Silber’s ruling that he and his Trust Special Administrator (TSA) had acted unlawfully by including Lewisham Hospital in the plans to eradicate the gaping deficit at South Lewisham Healthcare Trust.

If the appeal is successful, no hospital, no matter how successful will be safe from closure in order to top up the finances at a financially-stricken neighbouring Trust - as covered in depth in OurNHS yesterday. But Rosa Curling from law firm Leigh Day, who represented the Save Lewisham Hospital Campaign during the judicial review said:

“We remain confident that the Court of Appeal will uphold Mr Justice Silber's decision and we intend to request an urgent hearing so the ongoing uncertainty facing the Hospital can be brought to an end as a matter of priority."

On behalf of the Save Lewisham Hospital Campaign, Tony O’Sullivan expressed disappointment at the Secretary of State’s decision to appeal, but reiterated the Campaign’s confidence that the strength of their case will be upheld at appeal. “Our commitment to defend the excellent services provided by Lewisham Hospital is unwavering,” he said.

However campaigners are outraged at this further waste of the taxpayer’s money. Already a petition calling for Hunt to accept the High Court decision has gained more than 16,000 signatures.

The consultation required for the disputed TSA process had cost over £5 million by January 2013, before legal proceedings against Hunt had even begun. The total cost of consultation and legal defense of the TSA process is likely to be significantly more by now. To appeal is to waste yet more money on a Government campaign that has neither the support of the public nor the law.

 If you liked this piece, you can sign up for OurNHS’s weekly update here, join our Facebook here or follow us on Twitter here.

 

 

How do we work after coronavirus?

The pandemic has profoundly changed our working lives. Millions have lost their jobs; others have had no choice but to continue working at great risk to their health. Many more have shouldered extra unpaid labour such as childcare.

Work has also been redefined. Some workers are defined as 'essential' – but most of them are among the lowest-paid in our societies.

Could this be an opportunity?

Amid the crisis, there has been a rise in interest in radical ideas, from four-day weeks to universal basic income.

Join us on 5pm UK time on 20 August as we discuss whether the pandemic might finally be a moment for challenging our reliance on work.

In conversation:

Sarah Jaffe, journalist and author of 'Work Won't Love You Back: How Devotion to Our Jobs Keeps Us Exploited, Exhausted, and Alone', due to be published next year.

Amelia Horgan, academic and author of 'Lost in Work: Escaping Capitalism', also due to be published next year.

Chair: Alice Martin, advisory board member of Autonomy, a think tank dedicated to the future of work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData