Skip to content

The problem of representation in ‘India’s Daughter’

Jyoti Singh, the real name of the woman in question, has not been allowed to be what she was, but made into what she had no say over.

Published:
Screenshot from YouTube
Screenshot from YouTube

Screenshot from YouTubeThe name ‘Nirbhaya’ (fearless one), attributed to Delhi’s gang rape victim of December 2012, whose violent death triggered off nation-wide outrage and protests, was the first instance of how the media manipulated the politics of representation.

It was through this naming that the victim was inducted into a symbolic nationalist imagery, evoking the figure of a challenged and challenging woman that suited everyone, willing to turn her example into a cause. The name was seen as a rightful vindication and representation of the woman’s image. The overwhelming success of this naming provided the first step towards inventing the deceased victim as a populist icon, easily exploited by the moralising tendency of the media and the state.

The state was thrust upon the role of a law enforcer, and stringent law was demanded from the judiciary. Activists and others gave in to the larger mood, demanding the need for further disciplining of society. A self-punitive consensus, in a nation already reeling under an alarming number of juridical encroachments in the name of ‘security’, was sought in order that it could be imposed on people’s lives.