Home: News

Refugee tortured for refusing to shoot protesters avoids Rwanda flight

The ex-police officer, who faced jail in Iran, was supposed to be on Priti Patel's deportation flight on Tuesday

Adam Bychawski
13 June 2022, 2.55pm

The UN has said the UK's Rwanda plan is unlawful.

|

ZUMA Press Inc / Alamy Stock Photo

A refugee who fled Iran – where he was tortured for refusing to shoot anti-government protesters – was just days away from being deported to Rwanda.  

Bahram*, an Iranian ex-police commander, travelled to the UK after an Iranian military court sentenced him to almost five years in jail in 2019.  

On Friday, he received a last-minute letter from the Home Office informing him that he will no longer be on the first scheduled deportation flight to Rwanda.

Several other refugees have also been told they will no longer be on the flight, which is due to take off tomorrow, after the plan was contested by human rights groups and lawyers.

Get our free Daily Email

Get one whole story, direct to your inbox every weekday.

Home secretary Priti Patel hoped to send more than a hundred refugees to the East African country on Tuesday, under a controversial new scheme that will see asylum claims processed offshore.

But the charity Care4Calais said it is aware of only ten people who are still scheduled to be deported.

Although he will not be on this flight to Rwanda, Bahram still faces the threat of deportation in the future.

“I cannot be happy. My whole heart is with all the refugees who will be forced to take the flight to Kigali and seek asylum from the government of Rwanda and according to Rwandan laws,” he told openDemocracy. “I am also still very stressed about what will happen next.” 

Bahram said he came to the UK to seek asylum and was unaware of the Rwanda plan when he arrived.

On Friday, a judge rejected an injunction by human rights groups to stop the deportation flight altogether. The Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), Care4Calais and Detention Action, along with four asylum seekers facing removal, had issued judicial review proceedings in the High Court. 

The court case revealed that the United Nations had twice told the Home Office that its plan is unlawful. Lawyers representing the asylum seekers accused the government of falsely claiming it had the support of the international organisation. 

An appeal is being held today and a larger legal case against the scheme will be heard over the coming weeks.

On Saturday, Human Rights Watch warned that Rwanda cannot be considered a safe third country to send asylum seekers because of it has a track record of serious human rights violations.

The Home Office told openDemocracy that it would not comment on individual cases.

*Bahram’s name has been changed to protect his identity.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData